# Question about anisotropic thermal conductivity

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 June 30, 2016, 07:43 Question about anisotropic thermal conductivity #1 New Member   Alex Szwaykowski Join Date: Jun 2016 Posts: 2 Rep Power: 0 Hi all, I just started using STAR-CCM+ 9.02 as part of an internship and I've run into a problem that seems a bit over my head. I need to model the anisotropic thermal conductivity of a solid object and the issue I'm running into is that the thermal conductivity needs to be anisotropic and temperature dependent. I was able to model temperature dependent thermal conductivity as a 'Polynomial in (T)' for isotropic thermal conductivity, but when I switch to anisotropic thermal conductivity (Continua> Physics> Models> Solid> Al> Material Properties> Thermal Conductivity), that option is no longer available. Instead, I have to go down through "Regions> Body> Physics Values> Anisotropic Thermal Conductivity> Principal Tensor" in order to describe the thermal conductivity in the XX, YY, and ZZ directions. Unfortunately, my only options for describing thermal conductivity values in these cases are to use a constant, a table, a field function, or a user code. It's a little strange that the option for 'Polynomial in T' exists for Thermal Conductivity, but not for Anisotropic Thermal Conductivity. Is there a reason for this, or am I just misunderstanding something? Can anyone help me figure this out? I'm trying to learn how to use a field function or user code to do this and as someone who has never coded in C, C++, or Fortran, it's a bit overwhelming for me. Thanks!

 June 30, 2016, 08:34 #2 Member   Join Date: Nov 2015 Posts: 57 Rep Power: 7 Hi, You could use the "polynomial in T" and put it in form of a field function as you suggested; you should have the coefficients and exponants of your polynomial and the field function would have to be defined for the interval of temperatures you consider: [T1 - T2] : a*T^b +c*T^d etc..

 June 30, 2016, 09:26 #3 New Member   Alex Szwaykowski Join Date: Jun 2016 Posts: 2 Rep Power: 0 Thanks for the response, Just to clarify, this would mean that I would define a unique field function for each direction (XX, YY, and ZZ) which would be defined by a polynomial involving the primitive field function "Temperature"; is this correct?

 Tags anisotropic, field fucntion, user code

 Thread Tools Search this Thread Search this Thread: Advanced Search Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post val46 OpenFOAM 13 September 30, 2019 09:17 nickjuana CFX 62 May 19, 2015 14:32 iSaeed STAR-CCM+ 0 December 29, 2014 07:12 Sas CFX 15 July 13, 2010 09:56 Helger Dooley CFX 2 September 1, 2005 09:52

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:11.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Privacy Statement - Top