|
[Sponsors] |
August 8, 2016, 16:39 |
General Boundary Condition Ramping
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi all,
Doing turbomachinary simulations in STAR and using stagnation inlets. When ramping pressures, can it just be ramped in the shortest number of iterations where no divergence is seen, or is it better to ramp maybe 20% then hold steady for some time before continuing in the same way until 100% of the ramp is reached? I guess, I am wondering is there anyway of saying this way is generally better because....? Any input appreciated, Ed |
|
August 11, 2016, 06:55 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
kevin alun
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 106
Rep Power: 14 |
Are you only looking for an answer at 100% the dp or do you need information for other pressure differences?
Instead of ramping a pressure difference you could try ramping relaxation factors, but to answer your question in general I prefer doing the 20% be it pressure difference, heat source, run steady for awhile and than 40%, steady, ... at least this way you have a converged answer at some levels. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mixed inflow/outflow downstream boundary condition question | peob | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | February 3, 2017 10:54 |
Problem in setting Boundary Condition | Madhatter92 | CFX | 12 | January 12, 2016 04:39 |
Low torque values on Screw Turbine | Shaun Waters | CFX | 34 | July 23, 2015 08:16 |
An error has occurred in cfx5solve: | volo87 | CFX | 5 | June 14, 2013 17:44 |
CFX fails to calculate a diffuser pipe flow | shenying0710 | CFX | 7 | March 26, 2013 04:13 |