CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Simulating crossflow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 22, 2018, 00:57
Default Simulating crossflow
  #1
Member
 
Bernhard Stiehl
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 7
cheetthe1 is on a distinguished road
Hi all,


I am trying to simulate a (reacting) crossflow situation. The jetstream enters the main flow (100m/s) with 120..150m/s through an inlet duct with d = 4 mm. Boundary layer is depicted with appropriate prism layer cells. It is a steady model and i am using the AMG linear solver. My simulation has trouble to converge though, the main errors i ran into were:

-Every time - velocity turning up and down in the jet duct, no matter how i initialize it
-Every time - residuals are low for the conservation equtions E-1 E-2 but high for the chemistry E4 E5 E6 E7. Chemistry is not working.

-Sometimes - floating point error -> k-eps turbulence


Mass is correct, components are doing the right thing. All property magnitudes pretty much make sense from what i can see in the analysis. Pressure drop in the jetstream is very high (2-3bar on a length of 2cm, i was astonished). Re number in the jetstream (theory) should be between 100000 and 500000.


I am comparing polyhedral and trimmed meshes and different turbulence models but none of the models runs well by now. Please give me some input.


Thank you,

Bernie
cheetthe1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 22, 2018, 03:43
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
Rep Power: 24
me3840 is on a distinguished road
Step 1 to complex reacting flows is to not do the reacting part. Did you run your case with non-reacting flow and get satisfactory convergence and sensical results?
me3840 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 22, 2018, 13:04
Default
  #3
Member
 
Bernhard Stiehl
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 7
cheetthe1 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by me3840 View Post
Step 1 to complex reacting flows is to not do the reacting part. Did you run your case with non-reacting flow and get satisfactory convergence and sensical results?

Hello, yes I am looking at the non-reacting case first. The result is similar, sensical yes, properly converging no. It seems the energy equation is the one giving me a little trouble https://imgur.com/a/Bx9prEW

Last edited by cheetthe1; October 22, 2018 at 14:11.
cheetthe1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 22, 2018, 17:58
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
Rep Power: 24
me3840 is on a distinguished road
Those are steady residuals? It looks like there's an unsteady component to the flow field that the solver is struggling with. Look at some plane sections while it's iterating and see if you can find anything like that.
me3840 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 22, 2018, 18:13
Default
  #5
Member
 
Bernhard Stiehl
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 7
cheetthe1 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by me3840 View Post
Those are steady residuals? It looks like there's an unsteady component to the flow field that the solver is struggling with. Look at some plane sections while it's iterating and see if you can find anything like that.
Yes, it is the velocity in the inlet duct. It turns up and down. But why?
cheetthe1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 23, 2018, 14:08
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,232
Rep Power: 24
me3840 is on a distinguished road
Can you post a picture of the geometry and list the boundary conditions
me3840 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 26, 2018, 00:22
Default
  #7
Member
 
Bernhard Stiehl
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 7
cheetthe1 is on a distinguished road
I solved this problem, is was because I had selected segregated flow. With a coupled model that works well.


I am advancing to the reacting part now. I am trying to use the GRI-Mech 2 mechanism for CH4 and simulate the combustion. My flame is not bruning as much as it should though, just a tiny flame at the edge and very slow combustion.



I am considering two causes:
1) the tables are not appropriate, designed for air which I am not really having.
2) I tried both Laminar flame concept and Eddy Dissipation Concept, cause these models support the complex chemistry table definition. Are they appropriate?




Another thing which is giving me big trouble is the outlet, I can not find a way that it will not be restrictive. Using "Outlet" specifies the mass flux. "Pressure outlet" wants me to give p, T and fractions, which I do not want to specify, cause thats exactly the task of my combustion cfd.





Greetings, Cheet

Last edited by cheetthe1; October 26, 2018 at 03:29.
cheetthe1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 7, 2019, 18:39
Default
  #8
Member
 
Bernhard Stiehl
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 7
cheetthe1 is on a distinguished road
Some months later! I advanced alot with the model and improved the mesh. Model converges but slow, especially complex chemistry convergence is very slow. Any suggestions to accelerate it? Could an increased CFL number help? Or should I limit the chemistry timestep? Or change the acceleration factor of the Laminar Flame Concept (currently on default = 0.5)? It is a steady model with full chemistry.


I also looked into the Complex Chemistry solver model itself more. There is clustering (selected are temperature, equivalence ratio and chemistry time step by default - should I select species aswell?);
and in-situ adaptive tabulation would be an option? My mechanism has 53 species and 325 reactions.



Thank you,
greets Cheet

Last edited by cheetthe1; January 8, 2019 at 00:54.
cheetthe1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 15, 2019, 09:40
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,666
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheetthe1 View Post
My mechanism has 53 species and 325 reactions.
Smells like GRIMECH 3.0. =)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheetthe1 View Post
I also looked into the Complex Chemistry solver model itself more. There is clustering (selected are temperature, equivalence ratio and chemistry time step by default - should I select species aswell?);
Clustering is on/off by default for your version? Turn it on. Clustering is the best way to accelerate it. The default clustering speeds up GRIMECH by a factor of 5x-20x.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 16, 2019, 18:30
Default
  #10
Member
 
Bernhard Stiehl
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 7
cheetthe1 is on a distinguished road
Actually that question is already answered, clustering is on for three signals as mentioned previously. Any other suggestions?
cheetthe1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 7, 2019, 12:12
Default
  #11
Member
 
Bernhard Stiehl
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 7
cheetthe1 is on a distinguished road
I am trying to use better turbulence models, like k-omega or Reynolds Stress.


The model computes one step, and is stuck when trying to compute the second step. Why is that happening?


edit: I am starting to lose my belief, the model runs and converges at a mesh size which is sufficiently coarse so it can be handled locally. When I put the EXACT same model onto the server, regardless of cpu/memory allocation, it will not run after step 1. Any reasons for that?


Bernie

Last edited by cheetthe1; February 8, 2019 at 11:35.
cheetthe1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Simulating a flapping airfoil by Fluent which the phase difference equals to 90 ronak ANSYS 1 March 26, 2020 13:24
Supersonic Crossflow andrewh FLUENT 0 August 21, 2017 02:09
Reynolds number for simulating with different domain lengths RS2 Main CFD Forum 3 September 16, 2014 06:40
Unsteady RANS simulation of Jet in crossflow harshad88 FLUENT 0 June 2, 2013 13:29
Help me on simulating sediment scouring with F3D v9.3.2 SHF66 FLOW-3D 0 September 27, 2011 13:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:00.