|
[Sponsors] | |||||
Difference between mesh created from Operations node and Continua node |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Mandeep Shetty
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 188
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
Hello, I am a newbie at using StarCCM+. I am trying to learn to mesh but I am confused with the meshing using the Operations node and the Continua node. What is the difference between these two different meshing options?
Ok from what I can understand the meshing from Operation node leads to Part based meshing and the one from Continua node leads to Region-based meshing. What is Part based continua nad how is it different from part based meshing? Last edited by granzer; November 16, 2019 at 11:40. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,846
Rep Power: 68 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Continua is where you typically start.
Operations introduces pipelines and adds automation, allowing you to automate the meshing process for a general scenario so that you can run hundreds of cases. Not all features are available in operations. If you plan on only running a few cases, continua and working with regions is the most straightforward way to do so. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Chaotic Water
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Elgrin Fau
Posts: 438
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
Quote:
- more than one Part can correspond to a Region; - part-based meshing meshes Parts, region-based meshing meshes Regions. |
||
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Tags |
| meshing basics, star ccm+ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|