CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Overset mesh motion issues

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By astrotoma

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 24, 2020, 10:17
Default Overset mesh motion issues
  #1
New Member
 
Toma Budanko
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
astrotoma is on a distinguished road
Dear all,


I am facing issues when running a model with an overset mesh and DFBI enabled. As you can see from the attached image of a simple test simulation of a floating cube, which shows the volume fraction on a section plane and the cube surface, the overset mesh seems to "drag" the fluid along while there seems to be no effect on the free surface in the background mesh.



Has anyone experienced this? I encountered the same problem in the "Lifeboat with overset mesh" tutorial.
Attached Images
File Type: png overset_issue.png (11.2 KB, 61 views)
Steklo_Plastik likes this.
astrotoma is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 28, 2020, 21:19
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Ping
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 556
Rep Power: 20
ping is on a distinguished road
it looks like your two regions have not been interfaced so do this and then use the overset mesh representation and overset status field functions to check the quality of the interfacing. you don’t need elongated cells since these are just used to save cell numbers in the free surface zone to create more cells vertically that horizontally
ping is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 30, 2020, 04:13
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Ping
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 556
Rep Power: 20
ping is on a distinguished road
for a newby to overset mesh large cubic cells will work well and give quick debugging of basic problems that are happening in this case. and there is no reason to have grids initially aligned eg one region could use polyhedral cells although this is not recommendend for the HRIC physics used in star when wanting a good free surface.

once those issues are resolved then the user can introduce some mesh refinement in the vertical direction and and possible grid refinement, small time steps, 2nd order physics etc.

flat elongated cells are used to save cell numbers when trying to capture waves in vof free surface cases and then only in the free surface zone. for example when trying to capture large droplets that break away from the free surface eg in sloshing and separators then cubic cells are recommended in those locations.

so back to the problem in this case - from the image it looks like the two fluid regions have not been attached to each other using an overset mesh interface.
ping is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to set periodic boundary conditions Ganesh FLUENT 15 November 18, 2020 07:09
Why does the mesh disappear after 'preview mesh motion'? dengdeng Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 3 September 18, 2018 01:39
mesh quality problem for displacementSBRStress motion solver zhaozhenkai OpenFOAM 0 January 22, 2017 12:02
Star CCM Overset Mesh Error (Rotating Turbine) thezack Siemens 7 October 12, 2016 12:14
Mesh motion with Translation & Rotation Doginal CFX 2 January 12, 2014 07:21


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:18.