CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Defining Relative Humidity while Solving a Simulation with Droplet Evaporation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 27, 2020, 05:53
Question Defining Relative Humidity while Solving a Simulation with Droplet Evaporation
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 242
Rep Power: 14
mohammad is on a distinguished road
Dear all,

This is my first time working with the evaporation model in STARCCM+. I am going to simulate evaporation of water-glycerin droplets. I have used Lagrangian multi-phase with the following settings as shown in the attached picture. However, I am wondering where should I insert the relative humidity (RH)? As I know, two factors are very important, Temperature and RH. The temperature tab exists under the "Reference Values". However, there is no sign of RH.

Attached Images
File Type: png model.png (37.2 KB, 13 views)
mohammad is offline   Reply With Quote


droplet, evaporation, lagrangian, relative humidity

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
problem with Min/max rho tH3f0rC3 OpenFOAM 8 July 31, 2019 09:48
chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam turbulent case Aditya Patil OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 April 24, 2017 22:13
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 06:20
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 bookie56 OpenFOAM Installation 8 August 13, 2011 04:03
Error while running rhoPisoFoam.. nileshjrane OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 August 26, 2010 12:50

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:31.