CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

No convergence + AMG solve rejected

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By ashokac7
  • 1 Post By Nikpap

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 9, 2021, 12:23
Default No convergence + AMG solve rejected
  #1
New Member
 
Thanos Alexopoulos
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Thanos_MEng is on a distinguished road
Hello,


I am a new star-CCM+ user, and I am trying to perform a 2D supersonic (M=1.9) cavity flow, over a rectangular cavity (Length=100mm, Depth=20mm). Selected coupled flow, unsteady, turbulent and K-OMEGA models. My residuals keep being constant as I run the simulation, especially Continuity and Energy. Other residuals perform spikes, which I understand means instability (maybe Cr too high?). I am also getting errors such as ''Maximum Temperature limited to xx on yy faces on Body 1'' and ''AMG solve rejected''.



Is the mesh quality the problem? What should I look for first to resolve the problem? I am doing my own studying too, but haven't got anywhere yet.
Thanos_MEng is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 10, 2021, 23:16
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
ashokac7's Avatar
 
Ashok Chaudhari
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 260
Rep Power: 10
ashokac7 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to ashokac7
It is not a good idea to start with coupled flow simulations directly unless segregated flow is not converging. Mesh resolution study can be done with segregated flow with less computational resources. Also first start with steady state. Note out what transient behaviour are missing and desired. Optimise your wall function criteria. See what results can be extracted from steady state. Then move on to next step.
Need more info like geometry pics, bc's, mesh parameters etc to comment anything related.
Aeronautics El. K. likes this.
ashokac7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 20, 2021, 06:55
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Nikolaos Papafilippou
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 7
Nikpap is on a distinguished road
Your problem could also stem from your timestep and/or CFL number jumps.

Also, sometimes steady solutions cannot be achieved for certain domains. In addition, it is accepted that coupled flow works better with supersonic cases compared to segragated flow. However, I agree with ashokac7, if timestepping and changes in the mesh to get the desired CFL do not work, try to simplify your case in order to have a benchmark that you can build upon.
Aeronautics El. K. likes this.
Nikpap is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 14, 2021, 06:37
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Lefteris
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 337
Rep Power: 15
Aeronautics El. K. is on a distinguished road
If it will help you at all, you can enable the "temporary storage retained" or change the verbosity in your solvers (I don't remember which option, sorry ) to see which one is diverging.
__________________
Lefteris

Aeronautics El. K. is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fail to converge when solving with a fabricated solution zizhou FLUENT 0 March 22, 2021 06:33
Solver parameters to solve convergence issue WilliamH SU2 5 February 5, 2021 06:19
Rising residual behaviour and convergence tjim SU2 0 October 12, 2018 04:04
About the AMG Linear Sover Convergence Tolerance LeeTao STAR-CCM+ 0 March 21, 2016 23:01
AMG versus ICCG msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 November 7, 2006 15:15


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:54.