|
[Sponsors] | |||||
Meshing strategy for ventilation jets from textile ducts in large hall (STAR-CCM+) |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Ulrich Baskerud
Join Date: Jan 2026
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Hi everyone,
I’m working on an indoor airflow simulation in STAR-CCM+, and I’m looking for best-practice advice on meshing strategy and inlet modeling for a ventilation system with many nozzles. Case description: – Large swimming hall with a high ceiling (9 meters at the highest point) – Supply air via textile ducts mounted under the ceiling – The ducts have multiple small nozzles, oriented downward – Expected air jet throw is approx. 8-9 m from the nozzles down into the occupied zone – Exhausts are placed two seperated places close to the floor in the first floor Current meshing approach: – One large Air region with a relatively coarse base mesh for most of the hall volume – A local volumetric mesh control below the textile ducts, extending approx. 8-9 m downward to resolve the supply jets – The refinement volume is currently ~3 m wide × 8 m high, with finer cells to capture jet development – The goal is to keep the total cell count manageable while still resolving jet behavior and room air distribution Main questions: For this type of ventilation system, is it considered better practice to: – Model each nozzle explicitly as a separate velocity inlet, or – Replace the nozzles with a single equivalent inlet surface / slot representing the total momentum and mass flow? If using an equivalent inlet approach, what is the recommended way to: – Preserve jet throw and momentum – Define inlet velocity vs mass flow – Choose inlet area and direction Regarding meshing: – Is a local volumetric refinement region following the jet path the correct strategy? – How wide would you typically make such a refinement region for an ~8 m jet (to account for spreading and possible angled discharge)? – Would you recommend multiple refinement levels (inner jet core + outer entrainment zone)? Are there any common pitfalls when meshing downward ventilation jets in large indoor volumes (e.g. excessive cell counts, convergence issues, over-refinement near the nozzle)? The simulation focus is overall airflow patterns, jet penetration into the occupied zone, and air mixing — not detailed nozzle-internal flow. Any guidance, rules of thumb, or references would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [Gmsh] gmshToFoam generates patches with 0 faces and 0 points | Simurgh | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 4 | August 25, 2023 08:58 |
| Star CCM -Meshing | arun1994 | STAR-CCM+ | 9 | March 31, 2020 10:55 |
| [Gmsh] Vertex numbering is dense | KateEisenhower | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 7 | August 3, 2015 11:49 |
| [Commercial meshers] Using starToFoam | clo | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 33 | September 26, 2012 05:04 |
| [Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | July 15, 2005 05:15 |