CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

Meshing strategy for ventilation jets from textile ducts in large hall (STAR-CCM+)

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 10, 2026, 05:55
Smile Meshing strategy for ventilation jets from textile ducts in large hall (STAR-CCM+)
  #1
New Member
 
Ulrich Baskerud
Join Date: Jan 2026
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Ulbas is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,

I’m working on an indoor airflow simulation in STAR-CCM+, and I’m looking for best-practice advice on meshing strategy and inlet modeling for a ventilation system with many nozzles.

Case description:
– Large swimming hall with a high ceiling (9 meters at the highest point)
– Supply air via textile ducts mounted under the ceiling
– The ducts have multiple small nozzles, oriented downward
– Expected air jet throw is approx. 8-9 m from the nozzles down into the occupied zone
– Exhausts are placed two seperated places close to the floor in the first floor

Current meshing approach:
– One large Air region with a relatively coarse base mesh for most of the hall volume
– A local volumetric mesh control below the textile ducts, extending approx. 8-9 m downward to resolve the supply jets
– The refinement volume is currently ~3 m wide × 8 m high, with finer cells to capture jet development
– The goal is to keep the total cell count manageable while still resolving jet behavior and room air distribution

Main questions:

For this type of ventilation system, is it considered better practice to:
– Model each nozzle explicitly as a separate velocity inlet, or
– Replace the nozzles with a single equivalent inlet surface / slot representing the total momentum and mass flow?

If using an equivalent inlet approach, what is the recommended way to:
– Preserve jet throw and momentum
– Define inlet velocity vs mass flow
– Choose inlet area and direction

Regarding meshing:
– Is a local volumetric refinement region following the jet path the correct strategy?
– How wide would you typically make such a refinement region for an ~8 m jet (to account for spreading and possible angled discharge)?
– Would you recommend multiple refinement levels (inner jet core + outer entrainment zone)?

Are there any common pitfalls when meshing downward ventilation jets in large indoor volumes (e.g. excessive cell counts, convergence issues, over-refinement near the nozzle)?

The simulation focus is overall airflow patterns, jet penetration into the occupied zone, and air mixing — not detailed nozzle-internal flow.

Any guidance, rules of thumb, or references would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance!
Ulbas is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Gmsh] gmshToFoam generates patches with 0 faces and 0 points Simurgh OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 4 August 25, 2023 08:58
Star CCM -Meshing arun1994 STAR-CCM+ 9 March 31, 2020 10:55
[Gmsh] Vertex numbering is dense KateEisenhower OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 7 August 3, 2015 11:49
[Commercial meshers] Using starToFoam clo OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 33 September 26, 2012 05:04
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues michele OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 July 15, 2005 05:15


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:02.