CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > STAR-CCM+

FSI and 6DOF

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 24, 2009, 23:37
Default FSI and 6DOF
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Valparaiso Chile
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 10
Marcelo is on a distinguished road
Dear All,

I have 2 questions

I need to know if star ccm+ works with ABAQUS in a FSI simulation


I need to model a free fall with 6dof (i am using a trial licence) could anybody help me with this? The institution could buy the software for me if I show a simple model

Marcelo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2009, 05:51
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 263
Rep Power: 12
ping is on a distinguished road
1. With STAR-CCM+ I read that you can both import and export surface data with abaqus, so you can do manual coupling of the codes (eg map temperatures from one to the other), and this could be automated to some extend with macros. STAR-CD can do two direct FSI coupling with abaqus so both solvers are running simultaneously.

But do you really need abaqus, since STAR-CCM+ can now solve the stress equations, so many FSI problems are very simple and much more efficiently solved than any other linking/mapping approach.

2. Free fall with 6DOF is very feasible - see an example of a shipping container falling into water here:

and how to set up a ship 6DOF model too:

You can ignore the wave model and just set you free surface level somewhere below the object you want to free fall.
ping is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2009, 20:52
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 10
panda is on a distinguished road
STAR-CCM+ can work together with ABAQUS, but I think the FSI is a one-way approach and thus the two software can only be loosely coulped. Maybe only CFX can do a fully coupled FSI simulation.

Last edited by panda; April 19, 2009 at 22:45.
panda is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 24, 2009, 22:20
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 93
Rep Power: 9
nomad is on a distinguished road
Does this need region interfacing, or is it just a simple volume mesh? I tried this with a windmill rotor, but can't seem to get any rpm out of it.
nomad is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 25, 2009, 01:02
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 263
Rep Power: 12
ping is on a distinguished road
It depends what you mean:
You only require multiple regions when you need different physics or mesh types within each. And then you only need interfacing if you want some connectivity between the regions. If the windmill is rotating (either MRF or rigid body motion) then you need a separate region to applied these conditions to. Can't see any need for 6DOF in this case since the stress solve will calculate the deflections.
If you what to solve stress within STAR-CCM+ then the solid rotor would also be another region and and interfaced to the fluid. Rotor deflection and coupling to the fluid is controlled automaticall for example by selecting the Large Deflection option after the Stress model is selected.
If you really want to couple to abaqus (not really required) you can do two way coupling in the code now by adding a macro to the solve and thus automate the backwards and forwards export and import process.
ping is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fsi ALFIN CD-adapco 7 July 8, 2007 09:58

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:46.