|
[Sponsors] |
April 22, 2009, 23:57 |
Star-CD vs Flow-3D?
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 129
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi All Users
Would like to understand if anyone has performance benchmark studied between Star-CD vs Flow-3D? especially focus on VOF and moving meshing options. Thanks in advance |
|
April 28, 2009, 00:14 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 129
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi anyone can help to advice? thanks in advance.
|
|
April 28, 2009, 12:48 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
you should focus on STAR-CCM+ rather than STAR-CD - see http://www.cd-adapco.com/applications/marine.html
I can not help you with benchmark data. It could help people to help you, if you could specify what kind of application you have in mind and what parameters are you looking for (resistance, etc.) |
|
April 28, 2009, 20:54 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 129
Rep Power: 17 |
Plucino
I'm actually looking at simulation that similar to Inkjet modeling. where the fluids droplets is generated through piston moving effect while moving from one point to others. So, do you have any idea? This will need both VOF and dynamic meshing technic, so i'm now consider Star-CCM+ vs Flow-3D, which will provide better accuracy and faster simulation time. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flow meter Design | CD adapco Group Marketing | Siemens | 3 | June 21, 2011 08:33 |
mass flow rate in STAR CD V3.26 | Paolo | Siemens | 3 | January 15, 2009 16:36 |
potential flow vs. Euler flow | curious ... | Main CFD Forum | 23 | July 21, 2006 07:40 |
Compressible flow computation with STAR | Veera | Siemens | 0 | June 19, 2004 04:31 |
Plug Flow | Franck | Main CFD Forum | 3 | September 4, 2003 05:57 |