CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > SU2 > SU2 Shape Design

Adjoint Euler Wall Boundary Condition

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 13, 2013, 03:24
Default Adjoint Euler Wall Boundary Condition
New Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 12
amphy404 is on a distinguished road
I'm looking for more information about the derivation of the adjoint Euler wall boundary condition. In particular, I'm interested in how the terms in the Residuals are derived.

I have read through Anderson & Venkatakrisnan's paper "Aerodynamic Design Optimization on Unstructured Grids with a Continuous Adjoint Formulation", but the wall b.c. in that paper looks a little different from the SU2 code.

Could someone please provide a link to some references?

amphy404 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2013, 02:37
New Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 12
amphy404 is on a distinguished road

I'm sorry to post again, but I'm still having trouble deciphering how the Euler adjoint wall boundary condition is implemented in function CAdjEulerSolution::BC_Euler_Wall().

Specifically, I'm having trouble understanding the following lines of code.

In the code below, it looks like the boundary equations are being subtracted from the adjoint velocity variables, but why do you do this? I know that the term ( phin - bcn ) should equal to zero from the adjoint boundary condition, so is this code a recursive way to drive this term to zero? Another guess I had was that this was related to Type 2 boundary condition as described in J. Reuther's PhD thesis (Chapter 7, p.176 eq.7.17), but in his thesis the values of Psi were extrapolated from the interior, whereas here it looks like it is just overriding the old values?

/*--- Introduce the boundary condition ---*/
for (iDim = 0; iDim < nDim; iDim++)
    Psi[iDim+1] -= ( phin - bcn ) * UnitaryNormal[iDim];
The residual terms below look very similar to those found in CCentJST_AdjFlow::SetResidual() where the adjoint system is solved for the interior grid. However, I'm not sure I understand how this adjoint boundary system was formulated. Also I noticed that the incompressible residuals are different from the compressible residuals shown below.
/*--- Inner products after introducing BC (Psi has changed) ---*/
phis1 = 0.0; phis2 = Psi[0] + Enthalpy * Psi[nVar-1];
for (iDim = 0; iDim < nDim; iDim++) {
    phis1 -= Normal[iDim]*Psi[iDim+1];
    phis2 += Velocity[iDim]*Psi[iDim+1];

/*--- Flux of the Euler wall ---*/
Residual[0] = ProjVel * Psi[0] - phis2 * ProjVel + phis1 * Gamma_Minus_One * sq_vel;
for (iDim = 0; iDim < nDim; iDim++)
    Residual[iDim+1] = ProjVel * Psi[iDim+1] - phis2 * Normal[iDim] - phis1 * Gamma_Minus_One * Velocity[iDim];
Residual[nVar-1] = ProjVel * Psi[nVar-1] + phis1 * Gamma_Minus_One;
Any help you can provide would be very much appreciated!

Thanks in advance,
amphy404 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 23, 2013, 14:29
Super Moderator
Francisco Palacios
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 404
Rep Power: 14
fpalacios is on a distinguished road
The continuous adjoint formulation in SU2 is original (inspired by Jameson and Pironneau works, and using classical differential geometry relations). More details can be found in:

Thank you for you interest in SU2,

PS.- The Anderson & Venkatakrisnan's paper is an outstanding one, but they found a limitation in the methodology dealing with the adjoint Navier-Stokes implementation (the need for 2nd order derivatives). We fixed that problem in AIAA_Journal_2007.pdf
fpalacios is offline   Reply With Quote


boundary condition

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Applying Rotational Boundary Condition on Surface with Radial Wall tango711 CFX 16 October 9, 2018 08:01
Domain Imbalance HMR CFX 5 October 10, 2016 06:57
Dirichlet boundary condition for additional variable on the wall ftab CFX 13 January 27, 2013 13:24
wall boundary condition safa_c Main CFD Forum 1 August 9, 2010 13:55
how to set up a wall boundary condition according to calculated wall shear stress? gameoverli OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 1 May 21, 2009 09:28

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:54.