Could SU2_V2.0.2 work properly with continuous_adjoint.py script in parallel mode？

Tommy Chen · April 12, 2013, 11:27

I have tried a 2-D simulation with countinuous solver (RANS)
it works OK in serial mode, however it doesn't work well in the parallel mode.

The .cfg and .su2 are the cases in the SU2_V2.0 testcases/rans/rae2822

fpalacios · April 18, 2013, 13:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommy Chen

I have tried a 2-D simulation with countinuous solver (RANS)
it works OK in serial mode, however it doesn't work well in the parallel mode.

The .cfg and .su2 are the cases in the SU2_V2.0 testcases/rans/rae2822

Hi Tommy,

I think that your problem should be related with the grid deformation capability in parallel. You are probably using 2D torsional springs which only works in serial, we have fixed that issue in the new developers version 2.0.3 that will be released today.

Best,
Francisco

April 12, 2013, 11:27	Could SU2_V2.0.2 work properly with continuous_adjoint.py script in parallel mode？	#1
Tommy Chen Member Tommy Chen Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: University of Michigan Posts: 96 Rep Power: 15	I have tried a 2-D simulation with countinuous solver (RANS) it works OK in serial mode, however it doesn't work well in the parallel mode. The .cfg and .su2 are the cases in the SU2_V2.0 testcases/rans/rae2822

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
RBF motion solver does not work well in parallel	lakeat	OpenFOAM Bugs	3	August 8, 2013 05:50
OpenFOAM 2.0.0. and 2.0.1 doesn't work in parallel mode	rv82	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	3	October 3, 2011 10:47
ATTENTION! Reliability problems in CFX 5.7	Joseph	CFX	14	April 20, 2010 15:45
Cases with small length scale work fine on a single processor but fail in parallel	adona058	OpenFOAM Bugs	5	April 17, 2009 04:41
Problems with parallel	wolfgray	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	0	April 14, 2008 04:36