CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > SU2

Turbulent Onera

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 7, 2013, 13:05
Default Turbulent Onera
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 13
Abhii is on a distinguished road

Thanks for excellent tutorial on Turbulent Onera, I have run Turbulent Onera M6 , but wanted to ask certain questions about parameters chosen in CFG file:

1) If we are comparing Coefficient of Pressure with experimental value, why cauchy convergence criteria is set on drag insteal on lift? (My simulation after converged after around 2500 iterations but lift was not converged so I changed convergence criteria to Lift & residual reduction from 3 to 5 & restarted the solution, my solution converged after around 12500 iterations.)

Note I am still running SU2 V 1.1


Last edited by Abhii; March 7, 2013 at 13:23.
Abhii is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 12, 2013, 01:08
Super Moderator
Thomas D. Economon
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Stanford, CA
Posts: 271
Rep Power: 14
economon is on a distinguished road
Hi Abhii,

Thanks for trying SU2 and the tutorials. As far as convergence criteria go, a relative reduction in order of magnitude for the residual has traditionally been used to measure convergence (CONV_CRITERIA= RESIDUAL, in the config file), but it is up to the user/designer to decide how to ultimately define convergence given their interests.

Another method is to look at the convergence of a particular force coefficient, such as lift or drag, and this might be particularly useful when comparing to experiment or during design when that quantity is the chosen objective function (CONV_CRITERIA= CAUCHY, in the config file). A little more explanation of this criteria can be found here:

Note that only one of these two criteria is ever active when set by the user, and in the case of the RESIDUAL criteria, it is always a relative reduction from some starting value (see the STARTCONV_ITER option).

Hope this helps!
economon is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2013, 09:02
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 13
Abhii is on a distinguished road
Thanks economon for the reply

I actually had another related question... I tried multigrid on fine mesh that is available with test cases, except that it diverges unless Full multi grid is on... what are the parameters available for FMG? but even with FMG output file surfaceflow.vtk is erroneous as in it Pressure coefficient on the surface of the wing is zero all around.

Abhii is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2013, 21:41
Super Moderator
Francisco Palacios
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 404
Rep Power: 15
fpalacios is on a distinguished road

As you know, with FMG you start converging the coarse grid levels and, when the code arrives to certain level of convergence on the coarse level, jumps to a finer grid level.

The parameter that you can adjust is the convergence criteria on the coarse levels using the Cauchy method (FULLMG_CAUCHY_EPS=)

fpalacios is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFX Treatment of Laminar and Turbulent Flows Jade M CFX 18 September 15, 2022 07:08
Problem with divergence TDK FLUENT 13 December 14, 2018 06:00
Turbulent Dispersion for Coal Combustion gravis CFX 2 March 23, 2010 23:56
setting value of turbulent intensity and turbulent viscosity ratio in wind tunnel nuimlabib Main CFD Forum 0 August 4, 2009 00:05
Problem of Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Limited David Yang FLUENT 3 June 3, 2002 06:13

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:20.