CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > SU2

Laminar Flow Over Supersonic Wedge Issue

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 22, 2019, 23:57
Post Laminar Flow Over Supersonic Wedge Issue
  #1
New Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 4
AlexF is on a distinguished road
Hi SU2 community,

I am trying to simulate laminar flow over a 2D supersonic wedge.

After forming the shock, the solution seems to converge extremely slowly, and I have been unable to adequately resolve the boundary layer. The inviscid shock region values agree with analytical results; however, the boundary layer and surface values do not (e.g. skin friction values from the simulation are much larger than those estimated using reference temperature methods). I have tried strategies such as adjusting the CFL, adjusting the relaxation factor, and using multigrid to increase convergence speed. This has sped up the time it takes to form the shock, but the boundary layer values still change extremely slowly.

I have had better success converging the solution using first order methods; however, the skin friction and pressure values at the wall (quantities of interest to me) are not accurate enough. Plotting the residuals show that they decrease but begin oscillating after the shock is formed (see attached image).

Why might this be happening, and does this signify a problem in the setup?

I attached my current configuration file and an image of the current grid I am using. The first cell height is on the order of 1e-5. Boundary conditions are as follows: supersonic inlet (freestream conditions correspond to 100,000 ft), supersonic outlet, symmetry, no-slip adiabatic wall, and Euler for the upper boundary. Since previous solutions showed the wall at a higher temperature than expected, I have also tried using an isothermal wall boundary condition with the temperature set as an estimate for an adiabatic wall (via recovery factor relation), but I still received similar non-converged results.

Do I have any obvious errors in my setup or configuration file that are preventing a better and more efficient converged solution?

Any advice or help is greatly appreciated,
Alex
Attached Images
File Type: png Residuals.PNG (25.8 KB, 21 views)
File Type: jpg grid.jpg (194.6 KB, 26 views)
Attached Files
File Type: txt config.txt (18.0 KB, 4 views)
AlexF is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 28, 2019, 09:02
Default
  #2
Member
 
Amit
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 9
aero_amit is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexF View Post
Hi SU2 community,

I am trying to simulate laminar flow over a 2D supersonic wedge.

After forming the shock, the solution seems to converge extremely slowly, and I have been unable to adequately resolve the boundary layer. The inviscid shock region values agree with analytical results; however, the boundary layer and surface values do not (e.g. skin friction values from the simulation are much larger than those estimated using reference temperature methods). I have tried strategies such as adjusting the CFL, adjusting the relaxation factor, and using multigrid to increase convergence speed. This has sped up the time it takes to form the shock, but the boundary layer values still change extremely slowly.

I have had better success converging the solution using first order methods; however, the skin friction and pressure values at the wall (quantities of interest to me) are not accurate enough. Plotting the residuals show that they decrease but begin oscillating after the shock is formed (see attached image).

Why might this be happening, and does this signify a problem in the setup?

I attached my current configuration file and an image of the current grid I am using. The first cell height is on the order of 1e-5. Boundary conditions are as follows: supersonic inlet (freestream conditions correspond to 100,000 ft), supersonic outlet, symmetry, no-slip adiabatic wall, and Euler for the upper boundary. Since previous solutions showed the wall at a higher temperature than expected, I have also tried using an isothermal wall boundary condition with the temperature set as an estimate for an adiabatic wall (via recovery factor relation), but I still received similar non-converged results.

Do I have any obvious errors in my setup or configuration file that are preventing a better and more efficient converged solution?

Any advice or help is greatly appreciated,
Alex
Can you share cfg and mesh file
aero_amit is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
laminar, supersonic, wedge

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[How to obtain supersonic flow inside a supersonic wind tunnel ?] yx213 Siemens 1 September 17, 2014 14:52
Influence of mesh density on laminar flow Ricevind FLUENT 2 June 16, 2014 09:53
2D Supersonic flow over wedge MFZALAM Main CFD Forum 0 September 18, 2013 13:13
how to simulate orifice in supersonic flow? YING FLUENT 2 May 16, 2013 11:41
Supersonic flow applied to a wedge! Manishkumar Main CFD Forum 3 January 28, 2000 02:33


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51.