|
[Sponsors] |
August 24, 2020, 16:09 |
low mach number flow in su2
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 6 |
Hi there,
I was just trying to simulate my own wing joined to a cylindrical fuselage in SU2. For the transonic regime, JST gave pretty good results. However, when I try to simulate at low mach numbers (incompressible regime), the solution does not converge. I am using ROE scheme with MUSCL_FLOW = YES. Any suggestions about running the test case at low mach numbers? Can anyone explain how to impose artificial compressibility in SU2 for these low mach numbers and how to impose low mach number preconditioning? Thanks in advance! |
|
August 25, 2020, 05:25 |
|
#2 |
Member
Akshay Koodly
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello,
You will have to use the incompressible solver. You can find examples and tutorials to set up here https://su2code.github.io/tutorials/...lent_NACA0012/ for example. Cheers |
|
August 25, 2020, 11:49 |
|
#3 |
Member
Amit
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 13 |
You can also try low Mach schemes like AUSMPLUSUP and SLAU. These schemes do well for Mach 0.01 or even lower (proper scaling of numerical dissipation). But without Time derivative preconditioning, I recommend you to use them upto Mach 0.1 and also add option USE_ACCURATE_FLUX_JACOBIANS = YES with above schemes (AUSMPLUSUP/UP2 or SLAU/SLAU2).
Last edited by aero_amit; September 12, 2020 at 16:05. |
|
September 10, 2020, 14:43 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 6 |
Thanks for the reply @aero.amit. I have tried LOW_MACH_CORR = YES and MUSCL_FLOW = YES options but that did not help. Does only USE_ACCURATE_FLUX_JACOBIANS = YES suffice for low mach case with the schemes you have suggested?
|
|
September 10, 2020, 14:45 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 6 |
Thanks for the reply @akoodlyr. I have tried that but that did not help. Any other suggestions would be great.
|
|
September 12, 2020, 08:50 |
|
#6 |
Member
Amit
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 13 |
Did you try AUSMPLUSUP scheme instead of JST?
|
|
September 12, 2020, 15:29 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 6 |
No, I have not tried that. Are you saying to try AUSMPLUSUP with USE_ACCURATE_FLUX_JACOBIANS = YES setting? Should I turn the MUSCL_FLOW = YES also for a second order scheme?
|
|
September 12, 2020, 16:02 |
|
#8 |
Member
Amit
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 13 |
Yes, try the above settings
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Foam::error::PrintStack | almir | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 92 | May 21, 2024 08:56 |
[snappyHexMesh] Error snappyhexmesh - Multiple outside loops | avinashjagdale | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 53 | March 8, 2019 10:42 |
[OpenFOAM.org] OF2.3.1 + OS13.2 - Trying to use the dummy Pstream library | aylalisa | OpenFOAM Installation | 23 | June 15, 2015 15:49 |
[blockMesh] --> foam fatal error: | lillo763 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | March 5, 2014 11:27 |
Turbulent flow at low Mach number | robyTKD | SU2 | 5 | January 3, 2014 04:18 |