CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > SU2

sawtooth friction coefficient

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 19, 2021, 09:17
Default sawtooth friction coefficient
  #1
Member
 
Jose Daniel
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 5
jdp810 is on a distinguished road
Hello all,

I am getting the skin friction of a profile but, even though the values are close to what I am expecting, the skin friction oscillates throughout the profile as you see in the attached picture. I also attach the config file I am using. It must be something about the MUSCL scheme, but if I deactivate it (convective part) the solution is no longer correct.

How can I solve this?

Thank you,
Jose
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cf.jpg (54.1 KB, 16 views)
Attached Files
File Type: txt solver_settings.txt (6.4 KB, 7 views)
jdp810 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 19, 2021, 10:24
Default
  #2
pcg
Senior Member
 
Pedro Gomes
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 465
Rep Power: 13
pcg is on a distinguished road
Try using the Venkatakrishnan-Wang limiter instead and experiment with the limiter constant a little.
Is the problem fully converged? Or do you have some oscillations in the residuals?
pcg is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 19, 2021, 10:38
Default
  #3
Member
 
Jose Daniel
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 5
jdp810 is on a distinguished road
The residuals end up oscillating. However the coefficients are converged. I have already tried changing the constant of the Venkatakrishnan limiter to a higher one but didn't have any noticeable change.

I'll try with the Venkatakrishnan-Wang next week, hope it solves it.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf 00_test_test_rms.pdf (168.9 KB, 5 views)
File Type: pdf 00_test_test_coeff.pdf (37.5 KB, 3 views)
jdp810 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 20, 2021, 04:38
Default
  #4
pcg
Senior Member
 
Pedro Gomes
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 465
Rep Power: 13
pcg is on a distinguished road
That does not look converged enough.
I am not familiar with the incompressible solver and with 2nd order turbulence, most folks run it 1st order (even in other codes).
My experience with the compressible solver is that high CFL can sometimes stagnate convergence as the linear solver starts producing gibberish, this is harder to happen in 2D but... you can add LINSOL to the HISTORY_OUTPUT to see what convergence you are getting there.
If the grid is not completely unstructured multigrid may help a lot, try 2-3 levels, V-cycle with (1,1,1,1) pre-smoothing, all the other (0,0,0,0) and the damping factors to 0.7.
pcg is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 23, 2021, 04:41
Default
  #5
Member
 
Jose Daniel
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 5
jdp810 is on a distinguished road
So after trying with the VW limiter with a coefficient of 0.5 I got much better convergence as you can see, even the pressure coefficient is way smoother, thanks. The linear solver is also converged, it always finishes before the maximum iterations (I set 20) per step at around 1e-9 residual from the LINSOL output.

However, the skin friction has still the sawtooth shape. I run it at different alpha, but it appears at all alphas...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cf.jpg (66.9 KB, 15 views)
Attached Files
File Type: pdf 00_test_test_rms.pdf (24.9 KB, 5 views)
File Type: pdf 00_test_test_coeff.pdf (12.4 KB, 5 views)
jdp810 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 23, 2021, 06:47
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
bigfoot
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 499
Rep Power: 17
bigfootedrockmidget is on a distinguished road
Residuals are still going down, could you run it for another 5000 iterations and compare the results? Also, what is your y+ value? is it around 1 everywhere?
bigfootedrockmidget is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 25, 2021, 08:53
Default
  #7
Member
 
Jose Daniel
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 5
jdp810 is on a distinguished road
It looks converged now, but the skin friction profile is not smooth yet... The y plus is less than 1 for the entire profile except for the leading edge, but still, it is very low, I don't think that it is causing that behaviour.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cf.jpg (68.0 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg yplus.jpg (87.7 KB, 4 views)
Attached Files
File Type: pdf 00_test_test_rms.pdf (78.4 KB, 1 views)
File Type: pdf 00_test_test_coeff.pdf (11.7 KB, 1 views)
jdp810 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 25, 2021, 19:07
Default
  #8
pcg
Senior Member
 
Pedro Gomes
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 465
Rep Power: 13
pcg is on a distinguished road
I would try first order turbulence MUSCL_TURB= NO
You can also try lowering the CFL to see if it clears things a little, I find it odd that 20 iterations is enough to get 1e-9 residual.
pcg is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2021, 07:29
Default
  #9
Member
 
Jose Daniel
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 5
jdp810 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcg View Post
I would try first order turbulence MUSCL_TURB= NO
You can also try lowering the CFL to see if it clears things a little, I find it odd that 20 iterations is enough to get 1e-9 residual.
Sorry, I didn't mention that, when I changed to VW I already turned off second order turbulence and increased the linear iterations to 50. You can see the first 2000 iterations history in the zip file. Do you find something weird?
Attached Files
File Type: zip history.zip (56.3 KB, 0 views)
jdp810 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to calculate time averaged skin friction coefficient adilio FLUENT 2 January 28, 2017 05:00
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX Anna Tian CFX 1 June 16, 2013 06:28
the skin friction coefficient error from Fluent sutthinan Main CFD Forum 2 November 28, 2012 13:03
Openfoam friction coefficient differences. Peter88 OpenFOAM Post-Processing 0 February 8, 2011 10:07
Automotive test case vinz OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 98 October 27, 2008 08:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:01.