# Boussinesq eddy viscosity assumption

(Difference between revisions)
 Revision as of 12:52, 15 November 2011 (view source)Peter (Talk | contribs)m (Reverted edits by Jabler (talk) to last revision by AlmostSurelyRob)← Older edit Revision as of 00:03, 3 January 2012 (view source)Newer edit → Line 39: Line 39: {{stub}} {{stub}} + + [http://www.prlog.org/11289974-phone-number-lookup-verizon-phone-number-reverse-lookup-to-get-information-you-need-quickly.html reverse lookup] + + [http://thetvtopc.com/Reverse_Cell_Phone_Lookup_Number reverse phone lookup cell]

## Revision as of 00:03, 3 January 2012

In 1877 Boussinesq postulated[1][2] that the momentum transfer caused by turbulent eddies can be modeled with an eddy viscosity. This is in analogy with how the momentum transfer caused by the molecular motion in a gas can be described by a molecular viscosity. The Boussinesq assumption states that the Reynolds stress tensor, $\tau_{ij}$, is proportional to the trace-less mean strain rate tensor, $S_{ij}^*$, and can be written in the following way:

$\tau_{ij} = 2 \, \mu_t \, S_{ij}^* - \frac{2}{3} \rho k \delta_{ij}$

Where $\mu_t$ is a scalar property called the eddy viscosity. The same equation can be written more explicitly as:

$-\rho \overline{u'_i u'_j} = \mu_t \, \left( \frac{\partial U_i}{\partial x_j} + \frac{\partial U_j}{\partial x_i} - \frac{2}{3} \frac{\partial U_k}{\partial x_k} \delta_{ij} \right) - \frac{2}{3} \rho k \delta_{ij}$

Note that for incompressible flow:

$\frac{\partial U_k}{\partial x_k} = 0$

The Boussinesq eddy viscosity assumption is also often called the Boussinesq hypothesis or the Boussinesq approximation.