# Fluent FAQ

### From CFD-Wiki

(→What does the abbreviation mean?) |
(→What does the abbreviation mean?) |
||

Line 98: | Line 98: | ||

PDF = Probability Density Function<br> | PDF = Probability Density Function<br> | ||

URF = Under Relaxation Factor<br> | URF = Under Relaxation Factor<br> | ||

- | VOF = <br> | + | VOF = Volume Of Fluid <br> |

- | DPM = <br> | + | DPM = Discrete Phase Model <br> |

TUI = Text User Interface<br> | TUI = Text User Interface<br> | ||

GUI = Graphical user interface<br> | GUI = Graphical user interface<br> |

## Revision as of 09:46, 4 January 2006

This section is empty. This is just a suggestion on how to structure it. Please feel free to add questions and answers here!

## FLUENT

### Solver Related

#### What does the floating point error mean? How can I avoid it?

The floating point error has been reported many times and discussed a lot. Here are some of the answers found in the Fluent Forum:

**SOLVER AND ITERATION** -----I think if you set shorter time step, it may be good. Or changing little Under-Relaxiation-Factors, it may be good. In my experience, I set 1/3 Under-Relaxiation-Factors as default.� -----�also lower the values of under relaxation factor and use the coupled implicit solver� -----�Try to change under-relaxation factors and if it is unsteady problem maybe time step is to large.� -----�you can improve the ratio in the solve--control--limits, maybe that can help.� -----�you will need to decrease the Courant number� -----�If you still get the error, initialize the domain with nothing to 'Compute from...' Then click 'init'. Again select the surface from which you want to compute the initial values & iterate. This should work.� -----�Another reason could be a to high courant number - that means, that the steps between two iterations are too large and the change in the results is too large as well (high residuals)�

**GRID PROBLEMS** -----�this error comes when I start scaling grid. in gambit, all my dimension is in mm, when in fluent i convert it in meter using buttone SCALE. after it, when i iterate, about hundred iteration, this error appeared. but when i not scale my drawing to m...and let it be as in gambit..then the iteration is success. -----�hi I think you should check your mesh grid mesh is very high. your problem solve by selection a low mesh.� -----�Your mesh is so heavy that your computers resources are not enough. try to use coarser mesh.�

**BOUNDARY CONDITIONS** -----�In my case I had set a wall boundary condition instead of an axis boundary condition and then FLuent refuses to calculate telling me 'floating point error'.� -----�Your Boudary Conditions do not represent real physis.� -----�wrong boundary condition definition might cause the floating point error. For example setting an internal boundary as interior� -----�Once I had the problem, simulating a 2D chamber with a symmetry BC. I set the symmetry somewhere as �axe symmetric� and the floating point error occur� -----�check the turbulence parameter you set. reduce the turbulence intensity to less that one for first, say 50 iterations.

**USING A UDF** -----�What I mean is really often when people creates UDF they generally forget that for the first iteration some variable can be zero. Therefore if you are divided a number by zero your solver will blow up telling you 'non floating error'. 'non' means 'not a number'. Depending on your UDF this kind of error does not effectively happens at the first iteration. An example, if you are simulated a domain with a stagnant water as initial condition and you are calculated for the first iteration something like 1/Re therefore lets call it BOOM !!! because Re=0 . To find this kind of think there a simple way : reread your UDF.�

**MULTI PROCESSOR ISSUES** -----"I've had similar problems recently with floating point errors on a multi processor simulation. The solution for my problem seems to be to run on a single processor, where it runs fine....?�

**WRONG INITIATION** ----- Initiating the case with wrong conditions may lead to floating point error when the iterations start.

### Models Related

#### What is the turbulent viscosity ratio warning and how can I handle?

#### How can I determine the inputs for a porous media or porous jump from flow versus pressure drop data?

#### How do I model heat conduction in a composite wall?

#### What pressures should be specified at inlets and outlets for buoyancy flow problems?

#### Are there any general guidelines on selecting a turbulence model?

#### How can both turbulent and laminar flow be included in one model?

#### How to start a 3D simulation with an compressible medium and temperature changes? What is important to consider

### Solution Methodology

#### How do i carry out rotating body analysis, eg a rotating sphere or cylinder in flow?

#### How do i get better and faster convergence?

#### What is the role of under-relaxation parameters? What should be the optimum choice of these parameters?

They limit the influence of the previous iteration over the present one. If you choose small values it may prevent oscillations in residuum developing. At the same time the solution may need more time to converge. Keep the default values as they are given in FLUENT. You can decrease them gradually if necessary. Momentum 0.6, pressure 0.1, k 0.4, eps 0.4, mass source 1, viscosity 1.

### Tips

#### How to merge two mesh files and make one?

To merge two mesh files the suggested utility is tmerge. The syntax of tmerge is simple.

*utility tmerge -3d file1 file2 finalfile *

To join the two interior faces use:

*Grid->Fuse*

from the menu with Fluent.

#### How to run multiple cases in batch mode

This could be achieved by running it from journal file. The example journal file that runs two cases is given as

*
file read-case-data xxx1.cas
solve dual-time-iterate yyy1
file write-case-data zzz1.cas
file read-case-data xxx2.cas
yes *

**(comment: for discard cas dialog)**solve dual-time-iterate yyy2 file write-case-data zzz2.cas

have a look at this discussion:

http://www.cfd-online.com/Forum/fluent_archive.cgi?read=32615

#### Want to export Fieldview data for postprocssing during iterations

This could be done with the help of menu **solve->Execute Commands **.
Here are two examples:

Steady Case

**
**

- file/export/fug/File_grid-%n

**file/export/fud/File_data-%n pressure velocity-magnitude x-velocity y-velocity z-velocity ()**

Unsteady Case

**
**

- file/export/fug/File_grid-%t

**file/export/fud/File_data-%t pressure velocity-magnitude x-velocity y-velocity z-velocity ()**

You can chose the frequency of export from the **Execute Command** panel.

#### What does the abbreviation mean?

CFD = Computational Fluid dynamics

FEM = Finite element model

FVM = Finite Volume Method

FDM = Finite Difference Method

UDF = User defined function

PDF = Probability Density Function

URF = Under Relaxation Factor

VOF = Volume Of Fluid

DPM = Discrete Phase Model

TUI = Text User Interface

GUI = Graphical user interface

BC = Boundary Conditions

RANS = Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes Equations

#### What is the difference between FE and FV?

Following excerpt from Vivek Ranade's book will answer this question to some extent. "The distinguishing feature of FE method is that the equation are multiplied by weight function before they are integrated over the entire domain. This approximation is then substituted into the weighted integral of the conservation law. By minimizing the residual, a set of non-linear algebraic equations is obtained. An important advantage of the FE method is its superior ability to deal with a solution domain having complex geometry, It is however difficult to develop computationally efficient solution method for strongly coupled and non-linear equations using FE."

" The finite volume (FV) method uses the intergal form of the conservation equation as its starting point. The solution domain is divided into number of computational cells. The differential equation is integrated over the volume of each computational cell to obtain the algebraic equation". Those equations are solved iteratively to get the solution over the entire domain. Even if you start with FV method than also you will get the same form of algebraic equations as with FD method. For most of the cases FV and FD method and FD method is same, only approach is differetnt.

## FloWizard

## FIDAP

## POLYFLOW

## Pre-processors

### Gambit

### Gambit Turbo

### TGrid

## Application specific codes

### Icepak

### Airpak

### MixSim

## Educational codes

### FlowLab