Talk:Navier-Stokes equations
From CFD-Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: Should we really reference a paper about existence and uniqueness when the paper has been retracted due to errors? I'd prefer to change the text to just mention it as a try which failed (a...) |
(comment on prof. penny smith withdrawn paper) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should we really reference a paper about existence and uniqueness when the paper has been retracted due to errors? I'd prefer to change the text to just mention it as a try which failed (at least for now until a revised paper has been published). --[[User:Jola|Jola]] 07:32, 22 May 2007 (MDT) | Should we really reference a paper about existence and uniqueness when the paper has been retracted due to errors? I'd prefer to change the text to just mention it as a try which failed (at least for now until a revised paper has been published). --[[User:Jola|Jola]] 07:32, 22 May 2007 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I was just about to comment on the same thing. Since there have probably been dozens of unsuccessful attempts to solving the NS equations, I would leave out the comment all together. [[User:Stefanez|Stefanez]] 03:08, 11 August 2008 (MDT) | ||
Revision as of 09:08, 11 August 2008
Should we really reference a paper about existence and uniqueness when the paper has been retracted due to errors? I'd prefer to change the text to just mention it as a try which failed (at least for now until a revised paper has been published). --Jola 07:32, 22 May 2007 (MDT)
I was just about to comment on the same thing. Since there have probably been dozens of unsuccessful attempts to solving the NS equations, I would leave out the comment all together. Stefanez 03:08, 11 August 2008 (MDT)
