CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Wiki > Talk:Reynolds number

Talk:Reynolds number

From CFD-Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: I'm a bit hesitant if we should add so many links to non-existent pages. It will only be confusing and make the text more difficult to read. A few non-existent links to really important pa...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
I'm a bit hesitant if we should add so many links to non-existent pages. It will only be confusing and make the text more difficult to read. A few non-existent links to really important pages is okay I think, but then we should start filling the non-existing links with content instead of adding more non-existent links. At least that is my opinion. Or what do you think? --[[User:Jola|Jola]] 01:21, 24 August 2007 (MDT)
I'm a bit hesitant if we should add so many links to non-existent pages. It will only be confusing and make the text more difficult to read. A few non-existent links to really important pages is okay I think, but then we should start filling the non-existing links with content instead of adding more non-existent links. At least that is my opinion. Or what do you think? --[[User:Jola|Jola]] 01:21, 24 August 2007 (MDT)
 +
 +
: I had hoped that I would not be the first to respond to this, but I agree that too many links to non-existent pages is a bad thing.  Now, I think that we probably should have articles on some of these things, or at least we should be doing a better job of inter-article linking - I just set the momentum equation link to the Navier-Stokes article (which probably needs to be a link within the article rather than to the whole thing).  My opinion is this: we do need more interarticle links, but we should be filling in material as we go.  --[[User:Jasond|Jasond]] 15:12, 30 August 2007 (MDT)

Latest revision as of 21:12, 30 August 2007

I'm a bit hesitant if we should add so many links to non-existent pages. It will only be confusing and make the text more difficult to read. A few non-existent links to really important pages is okay I think, but then we should start filling the non-existing links with content instead of adding more non-existent links. At least that is my opinion. Or what do you think? --Jola 01:21, 24 August 2007 (MDT)

I had hoped that I would not be the first to respond to this, but I agree that too many links to non-existent pages is a bad thing. Now, I think that we probably should have articles on some of these things, or at least we should be doing a better job of inter-article linking - I just set the momentum equation link to the Navier-Stokes article (which probably needs to be a link within the article rather than to the whole thing). My opinion is this: we do need more interarticle links, but we should be filling in material as we go. --Jasond 15:12, 30 August 2007 (MDT)
My wiki