Smooth rectabgular duct - Simulation vs. Literature correlations
I have done simulations of a turbulent air flow in a smooth rectangular duct. I compared my numerical results of pressure drop (friction factor) with literature correlations.
Here follows a brief summary of my simulation (because of symmetry I have only simulated one-fourth of the duct):
Fluid: air with costant properties
Turb model: k-w standard
y+: everywhere below 2.5 and above 0.8
Inlet B.C.: mass flow inlet
Outlet B.C.: outflow
Reynolds number: 7666
I compared my results for the pressure drop (or friction factor) with some literature correlations, e.g. f=(1.82*log_10 Re -1.64)^-2 (Gnielinski) and I have foud a mean discrepancy of 12%.
I have also performed a sensitivity analysis on the grid but the results do not change.
Can anyone inform me if such a discrepancy is acceptable or if it is typically possible to obtain a better agreement between numerical simulation and literature correlation for the friction factor (or pressure drop)?
Thank you in advance,
|All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:53.|