|July 7, 2011, 05:59||
Smooth rectabgular duct - Simulation vs. Literature correlations
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 39Rep Power: 7
I have done simulations of a turbulent air flow in a smooth rectangular duct. I compared my numerical results of pressure drop (friction factor) with literature correlations.
Here follows a brief summary of my simulation (because of symmetry I have only simulated one-fourth of the duct):
Fluid: air with costant properties
Turb model: k-w standard
y+: everywhere below 2.5 and above 0.8
Inlet B.C.: mass flow inlet
Outlet B.C.: outflow
Reynolds number: 7666
I compared my results for the pressure drop (or friction factor) with some literature correlations, e.g. f=(1.82*log_10 Re -1.64)^-2 (Gnielinski) and I have foud a mean discrepancy of 12%.
I have also performed a sensitivity analysis on the grid but the results do not change.
Can anyone inform me if such a discrepancy is acceptable or if it is typically possible to obtain a better agreement between numerical simulation and literature correlation for the friction factor (or pressure drop)?
Thank you in advance,
|pressure drop, smooth duct, turbulent flow, validation|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Sample simulation of axial flow impeller in a duct||Vashishth||CFX||1||November 16, 2008 20:34|
|Fabric Duct Modeling||Dan||FLUENT||0||June 30, 2008 15:00|
|2D simulation of circular and rectangular duct||mvee||FLUENT||4||March 24, 2007 00:40|
|flow simulation across a small fan||jane luo||Main CFD Forum||15||April 12, 2004 17:49|
|2D diverging duct simulation||venugopal||Main CFD Forum||0||November 2, 2001 19:49|