SPH vs FVM
 

Hello dear colleagues

My way had born the question

Does have sense to solve TECFLAM-burner case in Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) solver instead of some FVM solver, like OpenFOAM or Fluent?

the TECFLAM case is here
http://qnet-ercoftac.cfms.org.uk/w/index.php/AC_2-06

Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) and its solvers is here
https://wiki.manchester.ac.uk/spheri....php/Main_Page

I start to work with SPH because it has more prospectives and it has more "white spots" comparing with FVM solvers.

So I guess, what chances has SPH method applied to usual field of FVM solvers?