CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   Main CFD Forum (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/)
-   -   viscous validation cases (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/189439-viscous-validation-cases.html)

naffrancois June 20, 2017 03:03

viscous validation cases
 
Dear all,

I implemented in a finite volume code full implicit and imex semi-implicit schemes for the NS equations at present without any turbulence model. I am looking for 2D/3D laminar viscous validation cases, apart from circular cylinder and flat plate that would show the gain of implicit time integration, especially for imex. Any idea will be greatly appreciated !

Cheers

FMDenaro June 20, 2017 03:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by naffrancois (Post 654091)
Dear all,

I implemented in a finite volume code full implicit and imex semi-implicit schemes for the NS equations at present without any turbulence model. I am looking for 2D/3D laminar viscous validation cases, apart from circular cylinder and flat plate that would show the gain of implicit time integration, especially for imex. Any idea will be greatly appreciated !

Cheers


This is an exact solution https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/434...00ac52c18e.pdf

I suggest to simulate also the backward facing-step and the lid-driven cavity as wall-bounded laminar flows

naffrancois June 20, 2017 07:31

Thank you FDenaro for these suggestions. I forgot to mention that I am dealing with the compressible NSE, so I think the lid-driven cavity test would be difficult without preconditionning.

apoorv June 20, 2017 07:43

Search for wind turbine cases
 
Search for low Reynolds number wind turbine airfoil case, that may laminar. Hoping that you are working on Preconditioned solver or a compressible solver that can work on mach 0.1.

FMDenaro June 20, 2017 09:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by naffrancois (Post 654143)
Thank you FDenaro for these suggestions. I forgot to mention that I am dealing with the compressible NSE, so I think the lid-driven cavity test would be difficult without preconditionning.


laminar flows are characterized by low Re number and that often implies low Mach number, without preconditioning the system is difficult to solve any of these cases

naffrancois June 21, 2017 02:47

I see, it makes sense. No chance to find a realistic transonic case in laminar regime I guess. Thank you for your answers :)

FMDenaro June 21, 2017 11:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by naffrancois (Post 654233)
I see, it makes sense. No chance to find a realistic transonic case in laminar regime I guess. Thank you for your answers :)


Well, some special airfoil profile have laminar design (at moderate Mach number)..You could try to search for some database...

arjun June 21, 2017 20:37

removing the post as code was not properly attached.

arjun June 21, 2017 20:40

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by FMDenaro (Post 654312)
Well, some special airfoil profile have laminar design (at moderate Mach number)..You could try to search for some database...


Code for the attached paper.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:25.