CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ICEM] plan of approach required

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree7Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 20, 2012, 12:07
Default plan of approach required
  #1
Senior Member
 
Ananthakrishnan.A.S
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mumbai (Bombay), India
Posts: 146
Rep Power: 7
Ananthakrishnan is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Ananthakrishnan
i have attached the jpeg of my 3D wing. it is completely asymmetric wing. I would like to know a crude plan of approach for the blocking. I personally think unstructured mesh would be better suited. please give you comments upon this idea as well..
Attached Files
File Type: zip jpegs.zip (52.2 KB, 15 views)
Ananthakrishnan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 20, 2012, 15:03
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Ananthakrishnan.A.S
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mumbai (Bombay), India
Posts: 146
Rep Power: 7
Ananthakrishnan is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Ananthakrishnan
I have pasted the pictures for quick reference..




Last edited by Ananthakrishnan; April 21, 2012 at 11:12.
Ananthakrishnan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 25, 2012, 06:16
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Christa
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 6
user_of_cfx is on a distinguished road
Hello Ananthakrishnan,

Without being an expert in any way, I would suggest you follow a similar blocking strategy to the sphere meshing tutorial of ICEM. In that tutorial, if I remember correctly, a block is placed in the middle of the sphere with an O-grid placed around it. You could do something similar here, only with a rather irregularly shaped central block (very thin most probably). Obviously the main problem would be mesh quality in the sharp corners at the top and left sides of your geometry.

Browsing through the ICEM tutorials may give you a better idea too.

I agree, however, that depending on the purpose of your simulation, it may be a better idea to use tetra.

Good luck!
user_of_cfx is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 27, 2012, 11:28
Default Little more info
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 5
E63 AMG is on a distinguished road
Hi Ananthakrishnan,

Just came across your thread. Are you still interested in block-mesh for this geometry? I may be able to share some ideas here.

If you could post the following images, I shall try the blocking.

a) Sectional view of the wing [deselect everything else, choose +z axis view, take a snap shot]

b) Same view, with domain boundaries included
E63 AMG is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 27, 2012, 14:29
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Ananthakrishnan.A.S
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mumbai (Bombay), India
Posts: 146
Rep Power: 7
Ananthakrishnan is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Ananthakrishnan
i have added the geometry file..
Attached Files
File Type: zip flipperwing(final).zip (17.1 KB, 19 views)
Ananthakrishnan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 30, 2012, 03:00
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 5
E63 AMG is on a distinguished road
Hi,

This wing has sharp trailing edge. So, blocking may not be feasible (Senior members can comment on this). I would suggest you to go ahead with un-structured mesh approach with sufficient prism layers. You could use the mesh density as well to ensure finer tet-mesh around the wing.

P.S.
I dont have an aero back-ground. But, in real life situation, wouldn't there be a thickness in the trailing edge?
E63 AMG is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 16, 2012, 02:57
Default
  #7
Member
 
Andrey
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Russia
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 7
Ralen is on a distinguished road
I have a few ideas. Could you attach the original geometry? I need to create a part for the surfaces of the wing: the upper and lower (it does not have a name in project).

P.S. I find it. It's PART_2 and PART_3.

Last edited by Ralen; May 16, 2012 at 03:24.
Ralen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 16, 2012, 06:58
Lightbulb
  #8
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,971
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 39
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
did you find the solution?
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 16, 2012, 07:24
Smile
  #9
Member
 
Andrey
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Russia
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 7
Ralen is on a distinguished road
While trying to do it.
Ralen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 16, 2012, 17:20
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Ananthakrishnan.A.S
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mumbai (Bombay), India
Posts: 146
Rep Power: 7
Ananthakrishnan is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Ananthakrishnan
I tried doing it with the usual technique employing a C grid and assosiating the edges. A y grid for trailing edge. The mesh looks pretty descent but the determinant 2*2*2 quality starts from -0.04..

I am thinking of mapped/free and swept blocks technique for the centre part containing the wing.. Will it be of any use?? If yes i need help in applying it..
Need help to either change the blocking strategy from start or improving the mesh quality with other techniques..

Ralen>where you able to find out the surfaces?? shall i upload again with proper names??
Ananthakrishnan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 16, 2012, 19:27
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
Ananthakrishnan.A.S
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mumbai (Bombay), India
Posts: 146
Rep Power: 7
Ananthakrishnan is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Ananthakrishnan
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/1n0atvmgw...r%20struct.rar

The above link contains a mesh without Y block..You can directly download the .blk and .tin files by simply clinking the link..If you zoom in on the tip or root of the wing, you will find that i have not assosiated the edge..Without associating it, the mesh is fine but when i associate it, the mesh at the leading edge of the wing gets completely twisted..

Please help in associating it without twisting the mesh

Without associating


After associating



Ananthakrishnan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2012, 14:20
Default
  #12
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,662
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 36
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
Ahh, classic misdirection...

You were focused on the edge across the tip, but that was not your actual problem. You actual problem causing the mesh collapse along the front edge of the wing is that you have the edges above and below the leading edge both projected to it... Right click on edges and "show associations" to make this clear. You may have also had a 2nd problem of associating the leading root edge to only the top or bottom profile curve, and that made the first error harder to find...

Anantha_01.jpg

So how to fix?

The best way is to create an ISO curve along the wing so that you have a curve to project to (Geometry => Create Curve => Surface Parameter => Method (Point on Edge)) And then associate those edges to the new curves...

Anantha_02.jpg

Anantha_03.jpg

You should also put an Ogrid thru your wing... It doesn't matter inside the wing, but it would have helped past the wing tip. Since you needed to collapse the trailing edge, this will require a wing box on the front half of the wing with the Ogrid thru that... you could create another iso line for the split down the middle of the wing, but I didn't bother because I kind of like it straight.

This shows the block selection for the Ogrid...
Anantha_04.jpg

While doing the block selection, I noticed that you had not deleted the blocks from inside the wing (or at least put them into a solid part), so I did that also.

There was a little work adjusting edge distributions on the new edges (copied from nearby)...

Anantha_05.jpg
Far, Ralen, sadjad.s and 1 others like this.
__________________
-----------------------------------------
Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys

Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey

This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)...

CFD Online Users Survey
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2012, 14:24
Default
  #13
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,662
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 36
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
And here is the blocking file...

I did plan to attach my version of the tetin file with the two iso curves, but it is too big to attach easily, so you can just create the isocurves yourself...
Attached Files
File Type: zip Anantha_BLK.zip (6.4 KB, 11 views)
__________________
-----------------------------------------
Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys

Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey

This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)...

CFD Online Users Survey
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2012, 14:33
Default
  #14
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,971
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 39
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Would you like to sharegeometry through ansys ftp or www.4shared.com

Last edited by Far; May 17, 2012 at 14:49.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2012, 14:41
Default
  #15
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,971
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 39
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
@Simon : It is great, as great as should be .

I am interested that how much quality you get for this type of geometry after blocking.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2012, 15:18
Default
  #16
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,662
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 36
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
I didn't check... But I also didn't try. I am sure there will be some need to adjust vertex locations and edge distributions.
__________________
-----------------------------------------
Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys

Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey

This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)...

CFD Online Users Survey
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2012, 15:22
Default
  #17
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,971
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 39
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Well, what I am trying to ask is that, geometry has very high curvature and sudden change in airfoil size. Therefore may be one need some advanced topologies as you have discussed in three part youtube tutorial on airfoil.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2012, 15:31
Default
  #18
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,662
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 36
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
This blocking looks fine to me...

I guess it may be good to have the Ogrid wrap around the end of the wing, but that is much harder to do with a sharp trailing edge...

Basically, you end up creating the Ogrid so it fills the the space around the wing and back to the outlet. You split this Ogrid for the surface of the wing (some Ogrid outside and some inside) and then you collapse the inside portion behind the trailing edge. Sorry, I don't have time to do that right now.

But as I said, this blocking is pretty good and can be adjusted (vertex movement and edge distribution) to exceed the quality requirements of all the major solvers.
Far and Ralen like this.
__________________
-----------------------------------------
Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys

Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey

This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)...

CFD Online Users Survey
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 18, 2012, 01:16
Default
  #19
Member
 
Andrey
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Russia
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 7
Ralen is on a distinguished road
And what about the triangular block at the rear of the wing? Convert to Y-block? My idea was somewhat different, but the first picture is the same.
Ralen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 18, 2012, 01:23
Default
  #20
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,971
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 39
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Quote:
And what about the triangular block at the rear of the wing? Convert to Y-block?
Similar idea is also discussed here. Structured Hexa Mesh on Wing
Ralen likes this.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
asymmetric wing, flipper geometry

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
wmake error zxj160 OpenFOAM 0 March 26, 2012 10:52
paraview installation woes vex OpenFOAM Installation 15 January 30, 2011 08:11
Problem with paraFoam on a linux-64 bit bunni OpenFOAM Paraview & paraFoam 4 April 14, 2010 20:55
Version 15 on Mac OS X gschaider OpenFOAM Installation 120 December 2, 2009 11:23
paraFoam reader for OpenFOAM 1.6 smart OpenFOAM Installation 13 November 16, 2009 22:41


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:09.