|September 17, 2012, 15:14||
Hard edge sizing vs Match Control
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 7Rep Power: 4
I'm attempting to mesh a cube with all vertical sides with "Match Control" or using hard edge sizing for the creation of periodic boundary conditions in Fluent. The goal is to use a pressure gradient to drive flow through the cube in a direction specified by a vector.
Is this possible? When using "Match Control" one set of faces is easy, attempting to use "Match Control" on the orthogonal set of faces generates the error that the mesh is over constrained.
Attempts to manually set all edge meshes and enforce the rule using "hard" behavior have been moderately successful at best: Sometimes fluent will allow the zones to be modified, sometimes it will not.
Any suggestions for best practices when attempting to enforce such a set of boundary conditions on vertical faces of a cube?
Thanks for your time and, if solved, this post might help a lot of people. I found numerous posts of similar problems, but no solutions.
|September 17, 2012, 19:05||
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 18Rep Power: 3
Is it really just a cube, or is it more complex than that?
That should be a sweepable surface. I would mesh one surface using edge controls (# divisions, not element size) and face sizing, then sweep it through the body.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|how to set periodic boundary conditions||Ganesh||FLUENT||12||April 10, 2013 01:44|
|[ANSYS Meshing] Edge Sizing Problems||nickdaish||ANSYS Meshing & Geometry||6||August 20, 2012 14:19|
|[ANSYS Meshing] Match Control, is this weird or am I stupid?||Moufle||ANSYS Meshing & Geometry||1||May 21, 2012 09:49|
|Match Control and Symmetry Boundary Condtions in a quasi 2D calculation||peterputer||ANSYS Meshing & Geometry||0||May 15, 2012 09:53|
|fluent add additional zones for the mesh file||SSL||FLUENT||2||January 26, 2008 12:55|