CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ANSYS Meshing] Questions regarding hex mesh

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 20, 2014, 12:03
Default Questions regarding hex mesh
  #1
Senior Member
 
OJ
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kindom
Posts: 475
Rep Power: 11
oj.bulmer will become famous soon enough
I have few questions regarding hex mesh:

1) Is it possible at all to have a prism inflation layers with structured hex mesh in ICEM CFD?
2) I understand that though ICEM CFD is generally used commercially for structured hex mesh, how robust is Workbench meshing for creating structured block meshes? Since ICEM CFD is a bit costly, we decided on Workbench meshing. I tried to create hex mesh for simple geometries like pipe etc by dividing the geometry at CAD level and I could get the structured mesh to work, but I am stumped when it comes to using this approach even for the easiest tutorial for ICEM CFD, viz. 3D pipe junction. It is not easy to visualize and create those blocks by dividing the geometry itself...
oj.bulmer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 20, 2014, 12:24
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,098
Rep Power: 19
flotus1 will become famous soon enoughflotus1 will become famous soon enough
Recently there were some nice features added to the Ansys mesher like MultiZone (Pipe bend meshing using MultiZone), but the capabilities are indeed limited when it comes to block-structured hexahedral meshes.
Those workarounds with splitting geometries to mimic the behavior of ICEM in the Ansys mesher are only for very simple geometries. Nobody would want to do this with anything more complex than an array of cylinders.
Even If you managed to split a complex geometry correctly, you would still be limited by the fact that you dont have enough control over the node distribution at the edges.

To conclude: For the kinds of meshes you have in mind, ICEM (or similar meshing tools) are the only reasonable choice.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 20, 2014, 12:57
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
OJ
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kindom
Posts: 475
Rep Power: 11
oj.bulmer will become famous soon enough
Thanks Alex. I can guess that when the geometry gets a bit complicated, the multizone will produce an unstructured hex mesh surrounded by prism instead of a structured one as shown in your last pic. From what I read, such unstructured hex mesh doesn't have much benefit over an adequate tet mesh, especially when it comes to complex industrial models.

Any thoughts?
oj.bulmer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 20, 2014, 18:06
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,098
Rep Power: 19
flotus1 will become famous soon enoughflotus1 will become famous soon enough
I would still prefer such an "unstructured" hexahedral mesh over a tet mesh.
Although it may not look as neat as a block-structured hexahedral mesh, it still has some of its advantageous properties.
Most importantly, the mesh is still "streamlined" with the geometry/main flow direction reducing numerical cross-diffusion to a minimum.
Even if that fails, the element quality still is superior to any tetrahedral mesh.
For low-end industrial applications like calculating pressure drops a good quality tet mesh may perform just as good,
but in my opinion this is because such kind of task could be performed with almost any kind and quality of mesh.

Then there is another new feature which I didnt try too much until now, but it looks very promising.
It is called HexCore and basically does the same as SnappyHexMesh.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 21, 2014, 07:23
Default
  #5
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,916
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 38
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Ansys meshing is combination of CFX mesh, gambit and some other algorithms and added multizone from ICEM CFD hexa.

The primary motivation of this all was to give a user integrated environment by implementing their (gambit, cfx mesh etc) best tools under one umbrella and also to provide it under the modern software architecture.

Main purpose of ansys meshing is to get you quick mesh with few clicks of mouse. Thats all. You should not expect more from it.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 23, 2014, 13:01
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
RicochetJ's Avatar
 
Mr CFD
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Britain
Posts: 290
Rep Power: 6
RicochetJ is on a distinguished road
Surely you can decompose your geometry in Ansys Meshing using the virtual topology option which will enable local control that you need?
RicochetJ is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
structured hex mesh

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2D Mesh Generation Tutorial for GMSH aeroslacker Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 12 January 19, 2012 04:52
Blockmesh error - 2D scramjet - please help ishaninair OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 7 March 18, 2011 01:14
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 12:55
Convergence moving mesh lr103476 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 November 19, 2007 15:09
Hex Core Mesh Bob FLUENT 0 May 28, 2004 13:16


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:49.