|April 13, 2009, 13:10||
Not sure how to mesh this
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 12Rep Power: 8
I am attempting to simulate flow around an instrument that is to be mounted under the wing of an aircraft. Instead of attempting to describe it, here is a screen shot from gambit:
The model I'm working with is extended back a little by projecting the rear [hidden] face in the +x direction to simulate the body of the probe past the shroud. This probe will be typically flying around 30k feet (200 mb) and 225 m/s, and I need to be able to simulate it with a compressible regime.
I've managed to mesh and model a test run, but It's not to my liking and I'm not sure exactly how to proceed.
Currently the bulk of the surface of the probe is meshed at a 1mm interval at the front working back to a 5mm interval on the less complicated portions of the shroud and body. This is as course as I could go while maintaining skewness under 0.5. The probe, from tip to back of the housing is approx 500 mm long and the tips are (outside edge-edge) 200 mm wide. I currently have a domain that is 1100x1000x1000 mm along the same axis layout as in the image. That puts 550 mm of clear air in front of the probe, about 350 in the +/- y direction and nearly 450 in the +/- Z.
I can successfully mesh this volume using T-grid, which produces reasonable results when run in noncompressible mode. However, the mesh interval in the critical region I want to study (between the tips and out in front) becomes very coarse, very quickly and I'm not sure I'm achieving the particle calculation accuracies I need.
Is there a way to essentially mesh an interior part of the volume on a constant mesh spacing, then grow that out through the rest of the volume? I tried dividing the volume into two parts...with a cylindar surrounding the probe, meshed at a small interval, then growing the mesh in the outer domain using a boundary layer and the cooper scheme, but that interface between the two volumes is causing weird things to happen.
|April 14, 2009, 02:04||
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,972Rep Power: 30
you can mesh everything with gambit (even complex geometries).
The problem occures when you try getting full hexa-mesh
Regarding your issue, try with tet-hexcore and apply size-function
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Dynamic Mesh Problem.||Tom Clark||FLUENT||9||July 7, 2010 07:56|
|virtual geometry||richard||FLUENT||4||January 7, 2009 06:16|
|2d irregular grid||Remy||Main CFD Forum||1||December 22, 2008 05:49|
|How to do Geometry from 3D mesh in ICEM||San24||Main CFD Forum||4||August 8, 2005 02:49|
|General questions on grid-based computing||Adrin Gharakhani||Main CFD Forum||21||June 5, 2000 13:47|