CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CD-adapco

Nusselt numbers for fully developed laminar flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 29, 2008, 16:03
Default Nusselt numbers for fully developed laminar flow
  #1
Danro
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, I am using StarCCM+ to calculate the Nusselt numbers and friction factors for fully developed laminar flow. I chose the steady state, constant density, stationary, laminar, segregated fluid temperature physical model for a 3D (round) pipe, which is subjected to a constant temperature boundary. The Nusselt number is suppose to be 3.66 once the flow is developed, but the results shows that the Nusselt number starts at the inlet with a value of 132 and then continuously decreases up to a value of 2.1 at the outlet. I get the same result even if I make the pipe longer. I would be very thankful if anyone can help me! Thank you!
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 31, 2008, 18:32
Default Re: Nusselt numbers for fully developed laminar fl
  #2
anon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Go to Tools>Field Functions>Nusselt Number and change the reference properties.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 3, 2008, 02:01
Default Re: Nusselt numbers for fully developed laminar fl
  #3
Danro
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I already did, it doesn't help.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 7, 2008, 18:24
Default Re: Nusselt numbers for fully developed laminar fl
  #4
rH
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I was running a similar problem a few months back and was able to achieve the analytical 3.66 Nusselt number. Several things to check, make sure that the length of your pipe is long enough for your flow to be thermally fully developed. Also, in my case I had to experiment with several different meshes (prism layers and refinement) before I was able to achieve the correct value.

For reference, how are you doing your postprocessing? Are you doing all the calculations in STAR-CCM for the Nusselt number? A detailed description of how you're doing the calcs and postprocessing may help in troubleshooting the issue.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 10, 2008, 10:56
Default Re: Nusselt numbers for fully developed laminar fl
  #5
Danro
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I only used the Nusselt number field function in STAR-CCM to calculate the Nusselt number
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 10, 2008, 13:42
Default Re: Nusselt numbers for fully developed laminar fl
  #6
Amod
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The flow has to be developed Hydraulically as well as Thermally. You can ensure the hydraulically fully developed flow by assigning the parabolic profile U = Um(1-r/R)^2 available in any Fluid Mechanics book. You can put similar profile for temperature. This will expedite the process and you may not need very very long pipe!

To predict H.T.C. correctly, one should continuously do mesh convergence study near the walls. Within 2 ~ 3 iteration, you will get the theoretically correct result.

Hope this explains!

|A| Always Positive!
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2010, 04:51
Default
  #7
Member
 
Mohammad Zakerzadeh
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Aachen, Germany
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 7
moh1367 is on a distinguished road
Hi guys!

My case is very simple , its laminar flow in a pipe with constant wall temperature. I take the length as long as the flow can reach to fully thermally and Hydrodunamically developed. When I get the Nusselt Number from the xyplot/Surface Nusselt Number it can seemed that the Nu begins from a large number(as predicted by theory) and go toward zero at the end of pipe (the theoric value is 3.66). Can anybody help me?
I can send my case to you for more information.

Thanks alot
.
moh1367 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 17, 2010, 12:22
Default
  #8
Member
 
Reza
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 99
Rep Power: 8
triple_r is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I know this is an old thread, but just wanted to add this for later reference :-)

I don't know how Star-CCM calculates the Nusselt number, but I just wanted to mention that when you calculate the Nusselt number, you need the value of heat transfer coefficient. In order to get the heat transfer coefficient, you need a temperature difference. In a pipe flow, the temperature difference is defined to be the difference between the wall temperature and the bulk temperature.
In order to get bulk temperature, you need to calculate the mass-flow average of the temperature in the cross section that you want to calculate h (and in turn Nu).
I know in CFX you can define a reference temp, but can't define the bulk temperature to be reference value (or at least I don't know how). So maybe that is the problem that you all getting a value that doesn't match the theory.
triple_r is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 19, 2012, 07:22
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Goutam Saha
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 128
Rep Power: 5
Goutam is on a distinguished road
[QUOTE=Amod
;176668]The flow has to be developed Hydraulically as well as Thermally. You can ensure the hydraulically fully developed flow by assigning the parabolic profile U = Um(1-r/R)^2 available in any Fluid Mechanics book. You can put similar profile for temperature.

Hi, whats the thermally fully developed profile for temperature !!!
Goutam is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
udf for 3D laminar fully developed flow salman FLUENT 0 November 9, 2006 22:45
Re: Fully Developed Flow Benny FLUENT 0 September 27, 2003 04:55
fully developed laminar flow prasat Main CFD Forum 1 March 6, 2003 08:39
fully developed laminar pipe flow wendy CFX 11 January 16, 2002 18:12
Fully developed flow grammi Main CFD Forum 2 October 6, 2000 21:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:00.