CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

URANS & SAS-SST: Computational Cost

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 31, 2012, 05:33
Default URANS & SAS-SST: Computational Cost
  #1
siw
Senior Member
 
Stuart
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 432
Rep Power: 11
siw is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I've just run a 3-D cube in a wall bounded domain at Re = 40,000 with SAS-SST. The purpose of the simulation was to see if a SAS-SST run could be set-up and run on my computer successfully. The results look reasonable.

I'm now repeating the simulation with URANS inc. SST (everything else being unchanged) for comparsion purposes.

I've read some papers about SAS-SST and as far as I can see there's only an additional term in the omega-equation, called QSAS.

So I assume that the computational expense (memory required and run time) would only be slightly greater for SAS-SST compared to URANS due to the QSAS term rather than being a significant rise in computational cost. Would that be a correct assumption? Do my other CFDer's use SAS-SST, since DES and LES are expensive for industrial tasks?

Thanks

PS. How can I get the eddy viscosity ratio in CFD-Post to colour the Q-criterion vortex core regions for showing the turbulence structure? I cannot find the turbulent eddy viscosity in CFD-Post or an equation to work it out.
siw is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 31, 2012, 06:01
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,150
Rep Power: 73
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
The expense of SAS and related models depends on the flow. The smaller the turbulent structures (ie higher Re) the harder these models get compared to RANS. RANS tends to improve in accuracy as Re gets higher.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 31, 2012, 12:13
Default
  #3
siw
Senior Member
 
Stuart
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 432
Rep Power: 11
siw is on a distinguished road
Thanks Glenn. Do you use SAS-SST much?

Also any hints with the eddy viscosity ratio query?
siw is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 31, 2012, 18:58
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,150
Rep Power: 73
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Do you use SAS-SST much?
Not for a very long time. Most of my models are micro-scale now so the flow is laminar.

Turb viscosity is a variable in the results file by default for turbulent simulations. You probably have to see the extra variables (under the "...." button) to see them.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Computational cost of transient turbulence model costinruja CFX 1 March 8, 2012 17:10
k Omega SST SAS for OpenFOAM 1.5??? barath.ezhilan OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 June 2, 2010 07:41
The cost of CFD efficiency Ben Metodiev Main CFD Forum 5 May 24, 2001 22:27
Short Course: Computational Thermal Analysis Dean S. Schrage Main CFD Forum 11 September 27, 2000 17:46


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21.