|
[Sponsors] |
July 21, 2012, 07:46 |
Flow over a flat plate as an immersed solid
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Hamed Abdul Majeed
Join Date: May 2012
Location: New Orleans, LA, US
Posts: 147
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi guys,
I used immersed solid approach in CFX for a flat plate to predict the boundary layer formation over it. I compared my results with a general case of flat plate, i.e. without using immersed solid domain. Although I know immersed solid under-predicts the boundary layer formation, however that is what I needed to find out. This post is the gist of my analysis. Earlier I have validated flow over a flat plate in cfx http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/cfx...lysis-cfx.html The flow parameters and references are same as defined in above link. I needed to change the geometry so that I could compare both the results. Flow over a flat plate (general case) Here is the model created. Meshing Then I applied the boundary conditions, the fluid domains need to be joined together by fluid fluid domain interface. Also wall b.c., inlet b.c. and symmetry b.c. are specified. At the exit i applied the outlet boundary condition. This the the velocity contour I obtained. Finally, I plotted the velocity vs Y plot, to see the boundary layer. The boundary layer thickness comes out to be 0.8 m. Which is quite good compared with the empirical value of 0.84m. Flow over a flat plate as an immersed solid I have done this part just to see how much the immersed solid approach under predicts the boundary layer. # of iterations 100, variable variation 1e-4 I used ANSYS CFX v 14.0, so I used all the options related to Momentum source scaling factor and Boundary Model. I used a range of Momentum source scaling factors and boundary models, these are the best results I could obtain. The solution converged. The velocity profile seems to be fairly accurate. Finally, I calculated the velocity vs Y plot, which gives boundary layer thickness to be 0.105 m. The empirical value as stated earlier is 0.84 m. Remarks I have not done the mesh independency test yet, I shall soon post it. The boundary layer is under predicted if immersed solid is used. This is clearly the case. I plotted the friction coefficient vs length plot but they are very inaccurate, i problem I need to counter far. Any comments and suggestions are appreciated. |
|
Tags |
flat plate, immersed boundary method, immersed solid |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
compressible laminar flow over flat plate | varunjain89 | Main CFD Forum | 19 | April 18, 2019 06:07 |
Flow Through an Immersed Solid ! | kimiaghalam | CFX | 4 | April 7, 2013 04:56 |
[ANSYS Meshing] Meshing for flat plate immersed solid | hamed.majeed | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | July 10, 2012 13:32 |
Supersonic flow over a flat plate and a blunt body. | Maddy | FLUENT | 0 | August 31, 2010 16:35 |
Flow Over Flat Plate | Lance | FLUENT | 1 | November 13, 2008 22:20 |