|
[Sponsors] |
December 17, 2012, 07:20 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Chris DeGroot
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 414
Rep Power: 17 |
In my opinion, CFX is more user friendly, although Fluent users tend to debate that
Fluent uses a classical finite volume method and has many options for PV coupling (segregated and coupled). CFX uses the control volume finite element method is only a coupled solver. They have similar models implemented and probably similar accuracy overall. I've heard Fluent is a bit faster on average. CFX is particularly good for turbomachinery and stiff multiphase problems since it can solve the volume fractions coupled. And the general grid interfaces are very useful. |
|
Tags |
cfx & fluent |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/cfx/110640-difference-between-ansys-cfx-fluent.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
Ingenieurthread [19] - mods.de - Forum | This thread | Refback | November 22, 2014 06:57 |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
difference between CFX and fluent | rashmi | FLUENT | 17 | February 3, 2020 07:29 |
Difference of result betn Fluent & CFX simulation for S2S radiation | njundale | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 0 | November 6, 2012 00:35 |
Difference between Fluent and CFX | safikhani_hamed | FLUENT | 1 | October 1, 2012 04:16 |
Difference between CFX and FLUENT | TypeSpeed | CFX | 3 | January 6, 2010 15:55 |
Converting ANSYS CFX files to Fluent files | Martin S. Rasmussen | FLUENT | 3 | January 30, 2007 15:08 |