CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

FSI analysis for blood vessel

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 13, 2013, 16:18
Default FSI analysis for blood vessel
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: California
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 4
faraday34 is on a distinguished road
Since it says turn on element shape checking, in mechanics shape checking is on standard mechanical. By the way it says to change if error message occurs after first step. The error occurs after 6th iteration.

Hi everybody

I am trying to simulate an aneurysm in a vessel. At the very beginning of simulations I encountered with problems. In the threads I have seen similar problems but can not get a solution, unless I missed it.


First of all when performing on the CFX Setup it warned as:

In Analysis 'Flow Analysis 1' - Output Control: No intermediate transient results files have been defined.

In Analysis 'Flow Analysis 1': Export results are unavailable as no suitable boundaries exist for use as export surfaces. Mesh motion on a boundary invalidates its use as an export surface.

I ignored those.

Then in the out file when solving structural before cfx:

A wall has been placed at portion(s) of an OUTLET |
| boundary condition (at 95.7% of the faces, 96.6% of the area) |
| to prevent fluid from flowing into the domain. |
| The boundary condition name is: Outlet. |
| The fluid name is: Fluid 1. |
| If this situation persists, consider switching |
| to an Opening type boundary condition instead.

And then:
Fatal error occurred when requesting Total Mesh Displacement for Interface.

In the error file it says:


*** ERROR *** CP = 62.931 TIME= 12:34:42
One or more elements have become highly distorted. Excessive
distortion of elements is usually a symptom indicating the need for
corrective action elsewhere. Try ramping the load up instead of step
applying the load (KBC,1). You may need to improve your mesh to
obtain elements with better aspect ratios. Also consider the behavior
of materials, contact pairs, and/or constraint equations. If this
message appears in the first iteration of first substep, be sure to
run shape checking of elements.

I am attaching the out and error file.

When I increase the mesh quality nothing changed. Only I get the error after waiting a little longer )

I will really really appreciate if someone can answer.

PS: I also attach the fluid & solid mesh with the weird picture in the results ( in case it may give some idea what is wrong)
Attached Images
File Type: png Figure001.png (31.4 KB, 20 views)
File Type: png FluidMesh.png (49.9 KB, 21 views)
File Type: png SolidMesh.png (43.3 KB, 20 views)
Attached Files
File Type: docx error.docx (3.1 KB, 7 views)
File Type: pdf solution-outfile.pdf (19.1 KB, 15 views)

Last edited by faraday34; June 13, 2013 at 19:03. Reason: I get no answer
faraday34 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 18, 2013, 17:08
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: California
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 4
faraday34 is on a distinguished road
For the ones who also questions such kind of question

Increasing young modulus of elasticity of the wall, making it in GPa made the solution converge.
faraday34 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 19, 2013, 03:25
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Lance
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 522
Rep Power: 11
Lance is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by faraday34 View Post
Increasing young modulus of elasticity of the wall, making it in GPa made the solution converge.
Sure, but how realistic is an arterial wall stiffness on the order of GPa? I doubt that you will have a realistic wall displacement.
Lance is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 19, 2013, 11:54
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: California
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 4
faraday34 is on a distinguished road
It is not realistic, but since I am at the beginning I was even not using blood, just water and trying to see if the model works. Geometry, mesh, fsi interface etc. Bcs are also need to be modified.
faraday34 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 19, 2013, 19:09
Default
  #5
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,646
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
I think Lance's comment is important - if the stiffness you use is a long way from the real stiffness then the setup is not going to be relevant for the real simulation. Change the stiffness to be at close to the actual stiffness.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Geometry for FSI in blood vessel Marten ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 June 9, 2010 07:14
Need help on FSI analysis and Re-meshing Approach khinthida2005 CFX 5 September 4, 2009 07:56
Properly using symmetry with both CFX and ANSYS workbench for a FSI analysis, help! Cirion0000 CFX 0 July 6, 2009 14:26
FSI Transient Thermal Analysis Abduri CFX 0 December 8, 2008 21:00
FSI analysis berger Sebastien CFX 0 May 3, 2005 07:50


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:40.