|June 3, 2014, 19:48||
Turbulence Model for Confined Jets
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 8Rep Power: 5
I am studying the impact force produced by a jet colliding against a wall.
The distance between the eject nozzle and the wall is variable.
The study fluid is water and the Re on the nozzle is about 80000. The turbulence model chosen is the SST.
After some tests, I noticed that the SST model doesn't fit exactly with the experimental data. To explain better my question, there is a curve in the attachment (from a study about evaluation of modified two-equation turbulence models for jet flow predictions.) that compares different turbulence models on the centerline velocity of a jet.
The problem is the delay in velocity to decrease, which is generating impact force larger than the experimental data in that range.
So, the question is: Is the SST model the best turbulence model available on CFX or you, CFD experts, have a better solution for me?
|June 4, 2014, 06:26||
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,638Rep Power: 98
Have you done the basic accuracy checks? http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys..._inaccurate.3F
In particular have you checked the inlet and atmospheric turbulence intensity is correct?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|SimpleFoam case with SpalartAllmaras turbulence model implemented||nedved||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||2||November 30, 2014 23:43|
|An error has occurred in cfx5solve:||volo87||CFX||5||June 14, 2013 17:44|
|K - epsilon VS SST turbulence model||Maicol||Main CFD Forum||0||November 30, 2012 17:25|
|Low Reynolds k-epsilon model||YJZ||ANSYS||1||August 20, 2010 13:57|
|KOmega Turbulence model from wwwopenFOAMWikinet||philippose||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||30||August 4, 2010 10:26|