CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

The difference between the current fixed and mobile blade row in CFX

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 19, 2016, 13:55
Default The difference between the current fixed and mobile blade row in CFX
  #1
New Member
 
Aleksandr
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Kharkov, Ukraine
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 2
metaliat93 is on a distinguished road
Dear users CFX
tell me, what's the difference between the calculations turbo machines with rotating and stationary blade row but with the feed stream at an angle?
Will the results be different?
??????????.png
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCM2_UKG6Mw
metaliat93 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 19, 2016, 18:12
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 11,571
Rep Power: 90
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
If the blades are just translating then there is no difference. If the blades are rotating then rotational effects occur - centripetal and coriolis accelerations. These accelerations will make cases 1 and 2 different.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 20, 2016, 03:25
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Aleksandr
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Kharkov, Ukraine
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 2
metaliat93 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
If the blades are just translating then there is no difference. If the blades are rotating then rotational effects occur - centripetal and coriolis accelerations. These accelerations will make cases 1 and 2 different.
Ok, I can solve the first task, but i never do the second. Does it doing with profile BC in CFX. I means that velocity can set from file with components of velocity, but domain is set stationary?
metaliat93 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 23, 2016, 01:24
Default
  #4
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 8
turbo is on a distinguished road
Your case 1 = Rotating frame of reference rotor blade row, but case 2 = Stationary frame of reference stator blade row.

Case 2 will have an inlet flow angle based on the inlet velocity triangle from U and C1, but will be a non-rotating cascade flow without the additional effects of Coriolis terms.
turbo is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   January 28, 2016, 14:35
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Aleksandr
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Kharkov, Ukraine
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 2
metaliat93 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbo View Post
Your case 1 = Rotating frame of reference rotor blade row, but case 2 = Stationary frame of reference stator blade row.

Case 2 will have an inlet flow angle based on the inlet velocity triangle from U and C1, but will be a non-rotating cascade flow without the additional effects of Coriolis terms.
Hello again, I am now occupied by this experiment. I had a Problem at the import stage Profile BC, as I said earlier, from rotating frame of reference rotor blade row (case 1) to the new case. In process of transportation, I`ve set centrifugal velocity (x) to 0. After this one Profile BC was loaded in the preprocessor. After solving the problem, the current lines were derived which revealed that the direction of the velocity has not changed, but it has become the axis direction.


Link
507326040.png

507326193.png

Thanks for help!
metaliat93 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 28, 2016, 16:06
Default
  #6
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 8
turbo is on a distinguished road
Your question is unclear to me, but
I guess your model is R1 of rotating frame, but the inlet flow is axial leading to a flow separation. If the flow vector is on the relative streamline, it means your inlet relative velocity (W1) is purely axial. Two possible reasons : (1) the blade velocity (U1 = r1*omega) is zero (2) the inlet absolute velocity vector has a big angle, so that W1 becomes axial.
I do not understand what you meant by "I've set centrifugal velocity (x) to 0". I guess it could be (1).
turbo is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   January 28, 2016, 18:02
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 400
Rep Power: 11
Opaque is on a distinguished road
I think your images do not illustrate your setup completely.

Please add the image for the Domain panel the inlet is attached to, and the image of the Basic Settings tab on the boundary as well.

So far, the only we can tell is that you specified the inlet velocity in Cartesian Components and the flow is subsonic. It is impossible to tell w/o the other two images, if you specify this velocity in the rotating frame, or the stationary frame.

Hope the above helps,
Opaque is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 30, 2016, 09:39
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Aleksandr
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Kharkov, Ukraine
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 2
metaliat93 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbo View Post
Your question is unclear to me, but
I guess your model is R1 of rotating frame, but the inlet flow is axial leading to a flow separation. If the flow vector is on the relative streamline, it means your inlet relative velocity (W1) is purely axial. Two possible reasons : (1) the blade velocity (U1 = r1*omega) is zero (2) the inlet absolute velocity vector has a big angle, so that W1 becomes axial.
I do not understand what you meant by "I've set centrifugal velocity (x) to 0". I guess it could be (1).
507483035.png
this screen my cordinate, from BC file. i think than U in is velocity to X cordinate.
At first I solve with rotating domaine, in post CFX I get BC file, than set stationary in setup of domaine. Install BC profile without centrifugal velocity U (if i think right).
metaliat93 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 30, 2016, 09:43
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Aleksandr
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Kharkov, Ukraine
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 2
metaliat93 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opaque View Post
I think your images do not illustrate your setup completely.

Please add the image for the Domain panel the inlet is attached to, and the image of the Basic Settings tab on the boundary as well.

So far, the only we can tell is that you specified the inlet velocity in Cartesian Components and the flow is subsonic. It is impossible to tell w/o the other two images, if you specify this velocity in the rotating frame, or the stationary frame.

Hope the above helps,
507483612.png
507483624.png
507483632.png
I can not instal velocity in Cartesian Components because I want to have different angle vectors of velosity on radius of blade
metaliat93 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 31, 2016, 09:56
Default
  #10
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 8
turbo is on a distinguished road
Sorry, still why you are doing this is unclear to me due to imperfect communication.

Your domain turned out to be stationary under the name of "R1" though. From your posted inlet velocity profile, the inlet flow is almost axial because u1=0 and v1 << w1 (= z direction velocity = axial velocity). You solved a staggered stator vane row with an axial inlet flow, resulting in of course the large stall.

I think you look confused between (u,v,w) absolute 3D velocity components and (U,V or C,W) turbomachinery velocity triangle notations. They are totally different.
turbo is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   February 5, 2016, 04:44
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Aleksandr
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Kharkov, Ukraine
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 2
metaliat93 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbo View Post
Sorry, still why you are doing this is unclear to me due to imperfect communication.

Your domain turned out to be stationary under the name of "R1" though. From your posted inlet velocity profile, the inlet flow is almost axial because u1=0 and v1 << w1 (= z direction velocity = axial velocity). You solved a staggered stator vane row with an axial inlet flow, resulting in of course the large stall.

I think you look confused between (u,v,w) absolute 3D velocity components and (U,V or C,W) turbomachinery velocity triangle notations. They are totally different.
Ok, I undertood, how can get rotating components of velosity if I take BC profile from Inlet (none rotating boundary). Inlet can not to be setting how rotating, does not it?
metaliat93 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cfx

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:38.