|
[Sponsors] |
August 17, 2001, 19:26 |
CFX, NT parallel, Linux, best platform
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On the CFX website a new version of CFX 4.4 is promised for the end of July that's supposed to enable parallel computing on homogeneous networks of PC's running Windows NT, and a port to Linux.
It's August, any idea when this latest version of CFX 4.4 will really come out? On a related point, what would be the best platform for transient problems (such as fluidised beds) that don't require very large mesh sizes, assuming that a lot of money is available for the hardware? CFX tells me they don't support Itanium (they do have a press release on their web site, dated October 2000, where they promise support for Itanium based hardware from SGI). Linux isn't supported yet, neither are Windows NT clusters. That would leave Windows NT and 4 Xeons, or Alphas from Compaq, or a dual processor Pentium 4. Maybe something from SGI, IBM. Assuming a fairly large budget, what option would be recommendable? And how much improvement would one get compared to a 1.2 GHz Athlon runing CFX4.4 on Windows NT? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cannot run Star-CCM+ parallel in Linux | dburns | Siemens | 9 | April 27, 2010 12:01 |
parallel processing- linux clusters | manoj s | FLUENT | 2 | June 20, 2007 18:48 |
problem with linux parallel | James | FLUENT | 2 | December 11, 2006 02:39 |
Parallel run fail in CFX5.7.1 in Linux FC.4 | Begonia | CFX | 1 | August 2, 2005 08:03 |
Parallel Fluent on Linux clusters | Chengwang Lei | FLUENT | 3 | November 24, 2004 02:05 |