# Different temperature after mesh refinement!?

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 October 13, 2004, 15:43 Different temperature after mesh refinement!? #1 Mark Guest   Posts: n/a Hi to all! I tried a simple problem. It is a quadratic channel (duct) where air of a defined temperature and mass flow rate is blown trough an inlet. On one side of the channel I set a heat flux. The other 3 walls are adiabatic. In CFX-Post I calculated the average temperature (640 K) on the surface where the heat flux was set. The arithmetic and the area average were nearly the same because the mesh is quite homogeneous. I solved the same geometry under the same conditions after a mesh refinement. The average temperature now is 970 K. After another refinement I derived 1070 K. I checked the global energy balance. It was fulfilled in all three cases. Has anybody an idea where the problem is??? Regards, Mark

 October 13, 2004, 17:36 Re: Different temperature after mesh refinement!? #2 NymphadoraTonks Guest   Posts: n/a You need to give more details of how you are refining the mesh. Mesh refinement should result in a more accurate modelling of the boundary layer, which is critical in this type of convective heat transfer. So your results being mesh dependant are hardly surprising. As you refine the mesh is the temperature starting to reach an asymptote? Are you using mesh inflation? What are your wall y+ values?

 October 13, 2004, 18:15 Re: Different temperature after mesh refinement!? #3 Glenn Horrocks Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, Don't forget that if you are using inflation layers at your boundaries, they are not refined tangent to the surface, but only prependicular to the surface. This means mesh refinement does not reduce the y+ value at walls with inflation layers. Glenn Horrocks

 October 14, 2004, 21:18 Re: Different temperature after mesh refinement!? #4 Mark Guest   Posts: n/a Thanks for your answers! It really seems to depend on the more accurate calculation of the boundary layer. My options in mesh design are limited to the tetra mesher of ICEM CFD 4.CFX, because I don't have a license for the hex mesher. I tried to work with the ANSYS Workbench but I have problems in creating a fluid domain that does not enclose the whole solid domain. I need a fluid domain going through my solid domain. Is it possible with the workbench? Thanks, Mark

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post vishwa OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 23 August 6, 2014 03:50 Svensson OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 11 January 18, 2012 10:13 SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 12:55 Joe CFX 2 March 26, 2007 18:10 Korsh Mik CFX 0 January 11, 2006 08:07

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:18.