CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

2D Simulation Airfoil Aspect Ratio

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 3, 2006, 07:11
Default 2D Simulation Airfoil Aspect Ratio
  #1
Kramer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi there,

I want to simulate an airfoil in a 2D situation. When i build up my Mesh with Icem, i have to build a pseudo 3D Mesh with only 1 cells in the not considered direction.

Because of SST-Turbulence Model i need y+ of 1 in the boundary layer.

So i get very very small elements there, but in the far wake the are much bigger. Considering the third direction (with 1 Cells) elements with bad aspect ratios occur (about 2000).

How do i avoid this? How "high" should the 1 cell be (1mm, 10cm, 1m)? (the domain is about 50mx50m)

I have some convergence problems. Could this happen because of the aspect ratio, or is it unimportant because the third dimension in unconsidered.

Thanks in advance.

  Reply With Quote

Old   February 3, 2006, 07:39
Default Re: 2D Simulation Airfoil Aspect Ratio
  #2
Camilo Costa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Try this!! Put the same length of smaller cell of your mesh in the direction that 1 cells in the not considered (i think that is z direction) and try not outdo the aspect ratios of 1.05!!

Forgive my bad english!
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 3, 2006, 10:26
Default Re: 2D Simulation Airfoil Aspect Ratio
  #3
ms
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Do a search in google for this paper,

has a picture of a typical airfoil mesh, should help

Detached Eddy Simulation of Flow around A-Airfoil

STEFAN SCHMIDT and FRANK THIELE
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 3, 2006, 11:45
Default Re: 2D Simulation Airfoil Aspect Ratio
  #4
kramer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi there,

thanks for your help first.

Costa when i do so, making the z-direction that small, like the smallest cells around the airfoil (boundary layer), the aspect ratio around the airfoil will be good. But in the far wake the aspect ratio will reach high levels, because there the cells are bigger (in the x and y direction). Do you think one has no problems with that?

1.05 aspect ratio?? Do you really mean the aspect ratio (for example X-length/z-length or y-length/z-length of one cell) or do you mean a scaling factor from one cell to another? I thought aspect ratio of 200 are just fine.

An other question, when i follow your hints the overall size of the elements will be very very small. Isn't that a problem when calculating forces for example, because you need a surface (which will be very very small then) to do so. So one gets really small values ca. 10e-06 or something like that, isnt that a problem of numerical accurancy.

Thanks in advance.

Kramer

  Reply With Quote

Old   February 3, 2006, 12:51
Default Re: 2D Simulation Airfoil Aspect Ratio
  #5
Camilo Costa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
donīt have a problem if in the far wake the aspect ratio will reach high levels, the important is that the residuals in condinate z be very very small!

forgive! 1.05 is the maximum scaling factor of you need use and not the aspect ratio!! The aspect ratio import when the bonduary conditions are importants near to close of bigs scales of aspects ratios. If not occur this, donīt have a problem.

I think that that numerical accurancy donīt be affected if your mesh will be very very small and the same coomb to overall size of the elements!

fogive bad english!!
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 5, 2006, 12:29
Default Re: 2D Simulation Airfoil Aspect Ratio *NM*
  #6
avinash patil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 6, 2006, 11:01
Default Re: 2D Simulation Airfoil Aspect Ratio
  #7
KBanks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You should probably aim for a "slice thickness" of about 2mm. It should be possible to get a reasonable y+ and aspect ratios of a few hundred. In my experience, CFX-10 will run on such a mesh quite happily and gives good agreement with experiment in the cases I have done. Your convergence difficulties could be coming from any number of other sources, so don't automatically assume it's due to aspect ratio (although 2000 is very high). Best of luck.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 6, 2006, 14:35
Default Re: 2D Simulation Airfoil Aspect Ratio
  #8
Camilo Costa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The aspect ratio is important when too the lenght scale of turbulence is small. This signify that, for example, if you have 1m of lenght scale, you need put 10 volumes of your mesh inside of 1m and your mesh need have 0,1 x 0,1 in maximum.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High aspect ratio oort OpenFOAM 5 September 16, 2011 14:06
pressure eq. "converges" after few time steps maddalena OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 69 July 21, 2011 07:42
Checking aspect ratio in Gridgen software madhukar_nal Pointwise & Gridgen 4 April 13, 2010 00:15
Compressible transonic airfoil RAE2822 simulation Stefano CD-adapco 9 June 21, 2006 10:47
does aspect ratio affect analysis mahesh Main CFD Forum 2 October 10, 2005 09:12


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:48.