CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

MFR or simply rotating wall???

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 5, 2006, 14:45
Default MFR or simply rotating wall???
  #1
Italianboy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I want to simulate a blower-volute system. i know that i can do that using MFR and GGI between volute domain (stationary) and blower domain (rotating). But i am wondering if it is possible to create only one domain and set on cfx_pre the blower walls as rotating walls. What are the differences between the two methods???

Many thanks.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 5, 2006, 16:20
Default Re: MFR or simply rotating wall???
  #2
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

If the blower is rotating then the only way is using MFR. Just setting a wall velocity on the blades but keeping them stationary is not meaningful.

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 5, 2006, 16:34
Default Re: MFR or simply rotating wall???
  #3
Italianboy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you Glenn, but i don't understand why just setting a wall velocity on the blades keeping them stationary is not meaningful.

If you want to study the relative velocity, i agree with you; but if you just want to know for example the difference in pressure between the inlet and the outlet, setting only the wall velocity for blades should be enough.

I am trying to study MFR theory again but i am not able to find an algebrical explanation.

Many thanks again.

Bye

  Reply With Quote

Old   November 5, 2006, 18:02
Default Re: MFR or simply rotating wall???
  #4
Camilo Costa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In CFX tutorial have one example whit MFR!!!
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 6, 2006, 02:43
Default Re: MFR or simply rotating wall???
  #5
Italianboy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I know Camilo, the question was another.

Thanks
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 6, 2006, 16:08
Default Re: MFR or simply rotating wall???
  #6
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

Keeping the mesh stationary but imposing a wall velocity is not meaningful. Try this mental experiment: Flow along a flat plate where the flat plate has a velocity perpendicular to the flow. Fluid which goes near the front of the plate is deflected upwards due to the wall velocity. This means no fluid can follow the surface of the plate as it has all been deflected upwards and continues to the exit with no influence of the wall. Some strange form of separation forms and I bet it won't converge.

As I said, this setup is not meaningful.

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 6, 2006, 16:28
Default Re: MFR or simply rotating wall???
  #7
Bian
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
MFR is totally different from moving wall!!!

In rotating frame, the governing N-S equation for the flow has centrifugal force in it. Everyone forgot?

If your volute is round (or nearly), you might simplify the problem by simulating all in the rotating frame, and setting reverse direction rotating wall for the volute wall.

Bian
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to set rotating wall as boundary condition babu FLUENT 7 December 14, 2013 05:48
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32
Rotating wall: Pressure BC in OpenFoam using rhoCentralFoam solver vinaykr OpenFOAM 0 June 27, 2011 04:11
Errors running allwmake in OpenFOAM141dev with WM_COMPILE_OPTION%3ddebug unoder OpenFOAM Installation 11 January 30, 2008 21:30
UDF for rotating wall Philippe FLUENT 0 January 30, 2006 12:03


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41.