# MFR or simply rotating wall???

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 November 5, 2006, 14:45 MFR or simply rotating wall??? #1 Italianboy Guest   Posts: n/a I want to simulate a blower-volute system. i know that i can do that using MFR and GGI between volute domain (stationary) and blower domain (rotating). But i am wondering if it is possible to create only one domain and set on cfx_pre the blower walls as rotating walls. What are the differences between the two methods??? Many thanks.

 November 5, 2006, 16:20 Re: MFR or simply rotating wall??? #2 Glenn Horrocks Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, If the blower is rotating then the only way is using MFR. Just setting a wall velocity on the blades but keeping them stationary is not meaningful. Glenn Horrocks

 November 5, 2006, 16:34 Re: MFR or simply rotating wall??? #3 Italianboy Guest   Posts: n/a Thank you Glenn, but i don't understand why just setting a wall velocity on the blades keeping them stationary is not meaningful. If you want to study the relative velocity, i agree with you; but if you just want to know for example the difference in pressure between the inlet and the outlet, setting only the wall velocity for blades should be enough. I am trying to study MFR theory again but i am not able to find an algebrical explanation. Many thanks again. Bye

 November 5, 2006, 18:02 Re: MFR or simply rotating wall??? #4 Camilo Costa Guest   Posts: n/a In CFX tutorial have one example whit MFR!!!

 November 6, 2006, 02:43 Re: MFR or simply rotating wall??? #5 Italianboy Guest   Posts: n/a I know Camilo, the question was another. Thanks

 November 6, 2006, 16:08 Re: MFR or simply rotating wall??? #6 Glenn Horrocks Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, Keeping the mesh stationary but imposing a wall velocity is not meaningful. Try this mental experiment: Flow along a flat plate where the flat plate has a velocity perpendicular to the flow. Fluid which goes near the front of the plate is deflected upwards due to the wall velocity. This means no fluid can follow the surface of the plate as it has all been deflected upwards and continues to the exit with no influence of the wall. Some strange form of separation forms and I bet it won't converge. As I said, this setup is not meaningful. Glenn Horrocks

 November 6, 2006, 16:28 Re: MFR or simply rotating wall??? #7 Bian Guest   Posts: n/a MFR is totally different from moving wall!!! In rotating frame, the governing N-S equation for the flow has centrifugal force in it. Everyone forgot? If your volute is round (or nearly), you might simplify the problem by simulating all in the rotating frame, and setting reverse direction rotating wall for the volute wall. Bian

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post babu FLUENT 7 December 14, 2013 05:48 Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32 vinaykr OpenFOAM 0 June 27, 2011 04:11 unoder OpenFOAM Installation 11 January 30, 2008 21:30 Philippe FLUENT 0 January 30, 2006 12:03

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:44.