CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Hardware for Serious Use

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 28, 2006, 00:25
Default Hardware for Serious Use
  #1
Justin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A question concerning hardware. I am thinking of gettinga Dual Xeon quad core setup with 16 G ram for some serious analysis but I have concerns about version 11 on XP64. Currently 11p5 does not really work on XP32, transient runs don't write results, parallel does not work etc (have not tried the XP64 variant but I expect similar results). I have until the end of Feb 2007 to do my work for a contract I have and cannot count on XP64 being ready in time for my work load, hence the following question.

Can I run a cluster of boxes running XP32 over distributed Parallel mode and be able to {exceed} the memory limitations of XP32. eg if I run a simulation of 16+ million elements over say 4 dual core XP32 boxes, each with 4 Gig ram, will the distributed parallel option effectively work around the 4 Gig memory limit to enable me to solve large problems in XP32?

My personal time line factors aside, am I better off buying an 8 core XP64 box with 16G ram, or 4 dual core XP32 boxes with 4G ram each? What would be the diference in procesing speed etc.

Linux is out of the question as I don't understand it, and cannot be bothered learning another OS just because XP64 is late.

Thanks Justin

  Reply With Quote

Old   December 28, 2006, 09:04
Default Re: Hardware for Serious Use
  #2
Joe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
"Can I run a cluster of boxes running XP32 over distributed Parallel mode and be able to {exceed} the memory limitations of XP32. eg if I run a simulation of 16+ million elements over say 4 dual core XP32 boxes, each with 4 Gig ram, will the distributed parallel option effectively work around the 4 Gig memory limit to enable me to solve large problems in XP32?"

Yes.

"My personal time line factors aside, am I better off buying an 8 core XP64 box with 16G ram, or 4 dual core XP32 boxes with 4G ram each? What would be the diference in procesing speed etc." A linux cluster (for parrallel performance reasons) would be ideal using the intel quad core Q6600 procs being released in January.

If you insist on windows (silly but your choice, its no harder to use than windows and it handles memory properly unlike windows) then the above two options would likely have negligable speed differences. Hence I would go for the 8 core single box (which could be doubled in future for a 2 box cluster with high speed interconnects etc)

You are being overly greedy on the memory side. CFX is CPU limited. A 5E6 cell problem (ie. 4 GB of ram) on a single quad core chip still takes about 100 seconds / iteration. 512 MB of RAM per core is more than enough. 2 GB per core is a waste ... spend the money on more CPUs.

  Reply With Quote

Old   January 1, 2007, 18:31
Default Re: Hardware for Serious Use
  #3
Justin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Can you run distributed parallel, either PVM or MPICH over two machines where one is XP32 running CFX10 for XP32, and the other is on XP64 running CFX10 for XP32?

Will the rsh 32 bit cfx 10 windows variant run on a XP64 box?

Thanks Justin

  Reply With Quote

Old   January 1, 2007, 20:27
Default Re: Hardware for Serious Use
  #4
Justin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sorry I forgot something. Can the account you use for rsh (either PVM or MPICH) have a blank password? Would this cause problems

Thanks Justin
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 2, 2007, 10:47
Default Re: Hardware for Serious Use
  #5
Bian
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
PVM definitely. MPICH probably not.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 3, 2007, 01:14
Default Re: Hardware for Serious Use
  #6
HekLeR
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
q1: It might work.

q2: yes.

why don't you ask your support rep for the cfx 11 pre-release which has all the p5 bugs you complained about fixed.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 3, 2007, 01:15
Default Re: Hardware for Serious Use
  #7
HekLeR
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
q1: yes. q2: no.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Looking for a pimpleFoam tutorial using Salome (and hardware recommendations?) madact OpenFOAM 1 May 27, 2010 01:24
Hardware recommendation? AMD X2, Phenom, Core2Duo, Quadcore? rparks OpenFOAM 0 April 22, 2009 09:10
Hardware Recommendation for Parallel Processing Brian Bian CFX 2 February 7, 2006 18:27
hardware for fluent Christian FLUENT 9 December 3, 2001 17:05
hardware Guus Jacobs Main CFD Forum 24 May 3, 2000 16:42


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:29.