CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

how to run explicit time scheme in CFX

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By ghorrocks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 6, 2018, 11:30
Default how to run explicit time scheme in CFX
  #1
Member
 
phd
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 12
lostking18 is on a distinguished road
Hi, there, I know for the steady state simulation, the pseudo time marching is obtained by 1st order implicit Euler method. Is there any method, such as expert parameter that we can use to implement the 1st order explicit Euler method? I have specific need for this temporal scheme despite its instability. Or if we use transient simulations, is there any chance we can run the explicit simulations?
lostking18 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 7, 2018, 06:01
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
No, you cannot change the time marching scheme for a steady state flow.

Can you run an explicit transient simulation in CFX? No.

CFX does not give you much control of the choice of numerical scheme. If you want to compare different numerical schemes you better go to software like Fluent or StarCD, or even better write it yourself.
lostking18 likes this.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 7, 2018, 14:59
Default
  #3
Member
 
phd
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 12
lostking18 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
No, you cannot change the time marching scheme for a steady state flow.

Can you run an explicit transient simulation in CFX? No.

CFX does not give you much control of the choice of numerical scheme. If you want to compare different numerical schemes you better go to software like Fluent or StarCD, or even better write it yourself.
Hi, Glenn, thank again! It's so sad that CFX looses the flexibility of this part. I may have to turn my head to Fluent.... But clearly the commercial code all have such kind of resitrictions here and there. I guess write the solver from zero is almost impossible for me. In terms of the open source code, do you have any recommendations? Openfoam? SU2?
lostking18 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 8, 2018, 05:58
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
All those open source codes are useful. There are plenty of simple open source codes which show the various solver methods, so if you don't want to write one yourself you can have a look at an open source one instead.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
steady solver, temporal scheme


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
bash script for pseudo-parallel usage of reconstructPar kwardle OpenFOAM Post-Processing 41 August 23, 2023 02:48
courant number increases to rather large values 6863523 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 22 July 5, 2023 23:48
pressure in incompressible solvers e.g. simpleFoam chrizzl OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 13 March 28, 2017 05:49
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 06:20
dynamic Mesh is faster than MRF???? sharonyue OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 14 August 26, 2013 07:47


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:22.