CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

CFX vs. multi processor

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 15, 2007, 12:08
Default CFX vs. multi processor
  #1
eslam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi everybody. We have one PC with two CPU that any CPU is a dual core, how we can use all of power of this PC in CFX? In CFX10 only we can use one CPU with dual core or two CPU that any of them have one core. Does CFX11 can help me? What's your suggestion?

Thanks

  Reply With Quote

Old   December 15, 2007, 16:45
Default Re: CFX vs. multi processor
  #2
HekLeR
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You need 2 parallel process license to utilize both cores.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 17, 2007, 07:13
Default Re: CFX vs. multi processor
  #3
Bart Prast
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
License-wise there is no difference between a multi-CPU or multi-core computer in CFX. If you want 4 partitions in a dual-CPU (with 2cdual core CPU's) you will need 4 parallel licenses.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 27, 2009, 07:18
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Peter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 9
ellevset is on a distinguished road
Does this mean that 1 license equals one process?

Running a quad-core computer in parallell is the same as running 4 individual single-core computers?

Does anyone else have any experience in running multi-core simulatinons? Is it worth the extra cost?
ellevset is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 27, 2009, 19:15
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 9
Baldy is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellevset View Post
Does this mean that 1 license equals one process?

Running a quad-core computer in parallell is the same as running 4 individual single-core computers?

Does anyone else have any experience in running multi-core simulatinons? Is it worth the extra cost?
Holy thread digging Batman.

But yes, one partition equals one license.
Baldy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 27, 2009, 19:30
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,832
Rep Power: 100
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
Yes, a thread back from the dead.

In my experience, on a modern Intel dual core CPU you can expect a speedup of 1.4 going local parallel. On an Intel quad core somewhere around 2.5-3 is possible. The Nehalem CPUs are much better than the older CPUs.

But given the software costs far exceed the hardware costs for commercial licenses there is no point running quad core CPUs on all cores. It is more cost-efficient to run a modern X5500 series CPU with only about 2 processes per core. This is ridiculous but the current licensing strategy makes multi-core CPUs give poor price to performance.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
problems after decomposing for running alessio.nz OpenFOAM 6 December 23, 2015 15:27
Problem with decomposePar tool vinz OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 18 January 26, 2011 03:17
Different flow pattern between OpenFOAM and CFX AirS OpenFOAM 0 January 12, 2010 08:08
heat generation in CFX Ema CFX 4 August 7, 2009 05:39
CFX 10's solutions differ from CFX 5.7's Atit Koonsrisuk CFX 4 July 26, 2006 11:59


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:25.