|
[Sponsors] |
March 19, 2009, 03:25 |
FSI simulation is DEAD SLOW
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Lance
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 669
Rep Power: 22 |
Hi,
I'm doing a 2-way FSI simulation using Workbench. It's basically a pipe with a precribed time dependent inlet velocity and outlet pressure. The problem is that my simulation is really really slow, and I wonder if there are some settings I've missed. One single timestep can take up to several hours even though my mesh sizes are reasonable small. I'm using a linux cluster with 16 GB RAM and 8 cores with HP MPI Distributed Parallel. My start command is: cfx5solve -def $deffile -double -name $name -ansys-license aa_r -ansys-input $inpfile -par-dist $(hostlist -e -s, -a'*8' $SLURM_NODELIST) -start-method "HP MPI Distributed Parallel" I've tried to add /nproc,2 to the ANSYS .inp file to get two cores, but couldn't see any difference. I also get a warning that: The current start method, HP MPI Distributed Parallel, is not a standard PVM parallel start method, and so the parallel option cannot be changed independently to Distributed Parallel. Request ignored. If you are using both -start-method and -par-local or -par-dist on the command line, you can move the -start-method switch to after the -par-*switch. What does this mean? I have -start-method after -par-dist in the start command. Any suggestions that could solve my problem(s) are highly appreciated! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
slow simulation | Shuo | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 28, 2008 19:07 |
Ultra slow convergence velocity in the simulation | demigod | FLUENT | 1 | October 5, 2005 08:03 |
EXA dead ? | CFD_user | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 1, 2005 22:56 |
Dead Leg | zahid | FLUENT | 0 | September 15, 2003 07:03 |
Is CFD a dead end? | Sebastien Perron | Main CFD Forum | 17 | March 25, 2001 21:00 |