CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Finned Pipe Trouble

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 26, 2009, 10:07
Default Finned Pipe Trouble
  #1
New Member
 
Fabio
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
fabioxyz is on a distinguished road
Hi, I need to solve a trouble with cfx used to simulate an example of "fin pipe" as in figure below, where the lower face of pipe trasmit a heat power and where ther is a flow of water.
The blue zone is a water domain. If each single fin separates blue zone into multi-parts domain, as we see in figure,

the solver fails imediatly and providing this error message:

An error has occurred in cfx5solve: |
| |
| Error interpolating results onto the new mesh: C:\Program |
| Files\Ansys Inc\v120\CFX\bin\winnt-amd64\solver-hpmpi.exe exited |
| with return code 1.


Otherwise if the fins are more little then pipe's height (as second figure) , domain is considered as a single part, and
the solver correctly runs.


Could you explain me the reason of that mistake?

ps for both geometry i have defined in cfx-pre the same elements:
  1. 1 fluid domain (1°geometry: nine parts not contiguous; 2°geometry one part)
  2. 1 solid domain
  3. One Boundary condition for water in flow
  4. One Boundary condition for water out flow
  5. Boundary condition for heat transfer from lower face of pipe
  6. interface from solid and liquid domains

Thanks
fabioxyz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2009, 18:29
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,815
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
For the case with separate fluid domains, put a separate inlet and outlet boundary condition on each face. I am not sure that's the problem but its worth a try.
ghorrocks is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   August 27, 2009, 04:55
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Fabio
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
fabioxyz is on a distinguished road
yes, with that solution, i'm sure working fine, but i think that are another way (more quick) to set cfx-pre...don't u think so?
fabioxyz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 27, 2009, 07:18
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,815
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
On the geometry you show it will only take a few minutes to set it up as I describe. How much quicker do you want? Are you going to spend days trying to speed the setup up by 5 minutes?
ghorrocks is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   August 27, 2009, 07:24
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Fabio
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
fabioxyz is on a distinguished road
yes yes, u are right, it'was only my curiosity
fabioxyz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 28, 2009, 03:44
Default Simmilar problem
  #6
Member
 
mistry
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: India
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 8
csmistry is on a distinguished road
Dear sir,

I am facing same problem for analysis of fluid flow with insert like for modeling i prepared one cylinder then i inserted a thin plate as you deed and then i cut that geometry.. it generates to parts for inlet i select to portions same way for outlet 2 portions and outer wall... means by putting this plate i am splitting the flow in two domains.... i am getting the same error as you are... return code 1.

please guide me what to do...
csmistry is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 28, 2009, 03:58
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Fabio
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
fabioxyz is on a distinguished road
as ghorrocks said me, try to create 2 equal boundary condition for Inlet and the same for out boundary condition. wait your news
fabioxyz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 28, 2009, 06:41
Default
  #8
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,815
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Or to put it more clearly a boundary condition should not span multiple domains. Boundary conditions which span multiple parts of the same domain which are not connected (eg two fluid regions in one fluid domain with a solid region in between) should also have separate boundary conditions on each region.
ghorrocks is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   August 31, 2009, 02:20
Default solution
  #9
Member
 
mistry
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: India
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 8
csmistry is on a distinguished road
Yes, thank you sir. i spend hours to have solution and i got it..
thanks a lot
csmistry is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
flow in perforated pipe distributor pertupd ANSYS 0 August 12, 2009 08:36
calculation of thrust thrugh a pipe with CD nozzle izhar Main CFD Forum 0 February 28, 2009 10:22
My Revised "Time Vs Energy" Article For Review Abhi Main CFD Forum 2 July 9, 2002 09:08
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History Abhi Main CFD Forum 12 July 8, 2002 09:11
fluid flow fundas ram Main CFD Forum 5 June 17, 2000 21:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:26.