CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Turbulent Schmidt Number default value

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 7, 2010, 05:47
Default Turbulent Schmidt Number default value
  #1
New Member
 
Forrest
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 7
Forrest_Lei is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

Recently I am revisiting some of the cavity natural convection cases I did before using CFX version 12 (previously the work was done by version 5.7 if i remember correctly). If I turn on the buoyancy 'production and dissipation', the turbulent schmidt number is now 2.0 by default, and I know it was 0.9 before. Does anyone know what are the underlying reasons to change this default value? What kind of difference we would expect with these two values for a closed cavity natural convection case? The case I am looking at right now is a well defined case, 2D, vertical walls have a temperature difference, the horizontal walls are adiabatic.

thank you for your comments

Regards,
Forrest
Forrest_Lei is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 7, 2010, 06:07
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,929
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
I have no idea why the turb schmidt number changed. If you don't like it then change it back! If you go through the release notes of the versions between 5.7 and 12 you should find a reason for the change. Alternately contact CFX support.

And by the way, there are not many turbulent natural convection cases which are 2D. They almost always develop 3D transient flow features if the Rayliegh number is high enough to generate turbulence.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 7, 2010, 06:29
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Forrest
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 7
Forrest_Lei is on a distinguished road
Dear Glenn,

Thanks for your quick reply. I am not quite sure when this was changed, since versions 10, 11, or 12, I will have a look the release notes if I still could find them for these versions.

I agree with you about the natural convection cases, most of the time they do not behave exactly as expected numerically. There were some experimental investigations in the past, researchers reported 2D characteristics of their 3D experiments, especially in the centre of their test cavity.

Regards,
Forrest
Forrest_Lei is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow vishwa OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 23 August 6, 2014 03:50
Low Reynolds number k-E Turbulent Model Sohail FLUENT 13 December 3, 2013 12:59
mesh file for flow over a circular cylinder Ardalan Main CFD Forum 6 April 17, 2010 23:40
Unaligned accesses on IA64 andre OpenFOAM 5 June 23, 2008 10:37
how to change turbulent schmilt number Andy CFX 1 April 8, 2006 05:35


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:07.