CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Flow over a sphere, wich model should i use

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 12, 2010, 22:09
Default Flow over a sphere, wich model should i use
  #1
New Member
 
Diego Felipe Mona´
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 7
dfmona is on a distinguished road
greetings i need some help
im confuse, i dont know wich turbulance model should i use, mi reynolds number is 12500, de diameter of the sphere is 0.065 m its enclose by a variable area duct, i have the idea that if i wanted to find accurate forces (y direction) on the sphere i should use k-e, but the resulst do not compare to the real model, you see im tryng to model a postion control of pneumatic levitation, is a steady state analysis, y got the real forces, at differnt heighs for different flow velocitys, plus im considering gravity on -y direction.
any ideas?

note: i put the gravity in the bouyancy option, 0 in x and z direction, and -9.8 in y direction is it right?

velocitys vary from 1.6m/s to 4.1m/s
dfmona is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 13, 2010, 10:20
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Attesz's Avatar
 
Attesz
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 355
Rep Power: 8
Attesz is an unknown quantity at this point
I think, SST k-w model is well suitable in your case. If you want to get the forces accurate, you should use a fine mesh around the sphere.
gravity settings seem to be OK, but does the gravity have significant effect?
Attesz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 13, 2010, 12:39
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Diego Felipe Mona´
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 7
dfmona is on a distinguished road
thanx for the fast reply, refering to the model im gonna show you how is my mesh, the y+ parameter is under 3 i guess thats enough, is it? plz help me decide if the mesh is ok, remember mi only goal is to get acurate forces on y direction, its kinda like drag force. its a 3d model this is a mesh cut plane view, thanks in adanvance

http://yfrog.com/mwmeshp


dfmona is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 13, 2010, 16:50
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Attesz's Avatar
 
Attesz
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 355
Rep Power: 8
Attesz is an unknown quantity at this point
hi, yplus is recommended to be under two, or mostly under 1. if you can do, use yplus under 1. otherwise, you should do mesh sensitivity studies to check your mesh-dependency. if you use more finer mesh and the forces doesn not change significantly your mesh is fine enough, otherwise you should use more cells.
anyway, the mesh seems to be good enough to me.
Attesz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 13, 2010, 17:32
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Diego Felipe Mona´
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 7
dfmona is on a distinguished road
thanx, yup i know, i have to do a mesh independence study. ok then, im gonna try moving down y+ parameter thanx alot
dfmona is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Use of k-epsilon and k-omega Models Jade M Main CFD Forum 12 June 2, 2015 13:16
Eul-Eul flow, k-e-kp-ep-Theta Turbulence model us FLUENT 5 April 5, 2011 02:29
Combustion Chamber flow - turbulence model folek FLUENT 0 April 13, 2010 15:58
Multiphase flow. Dispersed and free surface model Luis CFX 8 May 29, 2007 18:13
Baldwin-Lomax model in wall jet flow K.S.Chang Main CFD Forum 0 December 7, 2005 02:51


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:45.