CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

1 cell thick mesh not running as 2D simulation- why?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 16, 2010, 06:39
Default 1 cell thick mesh not running as 2D simulation- why?
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 65
Rep Power: 7
RossFS is on a distinguished road
Structured mesh is only one cell thick (generated in ICEM CFD 12.1):
smallest width of a cell: 0.25 units
smallest height of a cell: 0.5 units
thickness of 2D mesh: 0.25 or 0.025 or 0.0025 (all produce w components of momentum etc)

I'm using a free slip wall for the top boco, no slip wall for bottom boco, symmetry on front and back walls and inlet and outlet as inlet and outlet.

I'm getting a w component for momentum in the results. What is the go?

I take it that if a calculation is being conducted for the w components of values, that the computational cost is the same whether the value is very large or not?

--------------
I was using the trick of generating a 2D mesh in ICEM CFD and saving it as a Fluent file, but this doesn't always get the mesh thin enough to be a thickness similar to that of the smallest element of the 2D mesh.
RossFS is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 16, 2010, 18:02
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,824
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
The basics are covered here: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys..._simulation.3F

I assume "front and back" are your one cell thick direction, with symmetry planes.

You sometimes get some W momentum stuff because your geometry is not totally flat, you are not converging tight enough or you are doing a axisymmetric simulation (which will always have a W component).
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 17, 2010, 01:50
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 65
Rep Power: 7
RossFS is on a distinguished road
Yes, front and back are on either side of the 1 cell thick mesh.

Does CFX calculate values in the thickness/w direction even when the mesh is setup to run as 1 cell thick?


I ran a very simple 10x10x1 cell mesh (that I'm certain is flat and sufficiently thin [1 order of magnitude thinner than required]) with all the same setup conditions I've been using and still get a w velocity component, although it is very small (3e-18 m/s as opposed to the u velocity component of 557.6m/s in the free stream area).

Last edited by RossFS; September 17, 2010 at 21:11.
RossFS is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 17, 2010, 05:45
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,824
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Does CFX calculate values in the thickness/w direction even when the mesh is setup to run as 1 cell thick?
Yes, CFX has no 2D solver so uses a 3D solver. A very poor imitation - uses far more memory, CPU time and results file than it should but this is the most requested thing of the CFX solver I am sure. But it will never happen.

Quote:
I ran a very simple 10x10x1 cell mesh (that I'm certain is flat and sufficiently thing [1 order of magnitude thinner than required])
What do you think is required? Sounds like you have no idea what are talking about here...

If the mesh has only one element thickness in the z direction with symmetry planes on top and bottom it should not matter what the thickness is. But numerical issues become important so you should make the thickness approximately the size of the smallest element.

But the end effect is as you note - the Z velocities are 1E20 less than the U and V velocities. Once you take engineering accuracy into account that is a zero Z velocity.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 17, 2010, 21:16
Default
  #5
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 65
Rep Power: 7
RossFS is on a distinguished road
I guess the confusion has been that the documentation for CFX indicates that it will conduct a 2D simulation if you make the mesh 1 cell thick. According to you it does not (thanks very much for the clarification, if only I knew this much earlier!).
RossFS is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 17, 2010, 21:39
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,824
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
What the documentation means is the 3D simulation degenerates to a 2D one, where the third equation is trivial (but still calculated). This is why it is a 2D model, but very inefficient as it is using the full 3D equations.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
2d simulation, icem cfd

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] Generating Mesh for STL Car in Windtunnel Simulation tommymoose ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 48 April 15, 2013 04:24
Dynamic Mesh.. Layering.. cell addition kedarj14 OpenFOAM Programming & Development 0 January 29, 2010 02:48
Convergence moving mesh lr103476 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 November 19, 2007 15:09
Gambit problems Althea FLUENT 21 February 6, 2001 08:05
unstructured vs. structured grids Frank Muldoon Main CFD Forum 1 January 5, 1999 11:09


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55.