CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Steady state flow over cylinder

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 15, 2011, 16:53
Default Steady state flow over cylinder
  #1
Senior Member
 
Ugly Kid Joe
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 193
Rep Power: 6
vmlxb6 is on a distinguished road
I am trying to show von karman vortex street for a reynolds # of 200 (I know it is a simplest CFD problem, pls excuse me). I tried to run a steady state simulation in CFX and I dont see any vortex shedding. Its looks all symmetric. I tried changing everything. Convergence, boundary layer, Advection scheme number of iterations etc etc etc.
I ran the same case in FLUENT using Green Gauss Node based scheme. Same BC and Same initial conditions same mesh, and it shows vortex shedding. What could be the problem ????

I am attaching the velocity contours. Thank you guys.

http://img69.imageshack.us/i/cfx.png/

http://img13.imageshack.us/i/fluent.jpg/

Thank you.
vmlxb6 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 15, 2011, 17:29
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Joshua Counsil
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 366
Rep Power: 8
Josh is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by vmlxb6 View Post
I tried to run a steady state simulation in CFX and I dont see any vortex shedding. Its looks all symmetric.
Did you consider that it's not steady state? After all, vortex shedding is hardly a steady process. Run the simulation as transient.
Josh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 15, 2011, 19:34
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Ugly Kid Joe
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 193
Rep Power: 6
vmlxb6 is on a distinguished road
I realize that vortex shedding is not steady. But I need to know why is the contour plots different in FLUENT and different in CFX. At least the contours in CFX should give some kind of unsymmetrical vortex ???
It probably is the type of solver I am using or even the residuals at the end of convergence. CFX does a better job converging the solution (up to 10^-8). Am sure there may be other ways to converge the solution in FLUENT too, but who cares !!!!!!!

Thanks anyways. Appreciate your help !!!!
vmlxb6 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2011, 04:59
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,551
Rep Power: 76
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
If CFX has given a symmetric solution then that is correct - when the flow is averaged out it will be symmetric. But the physics will be totally wrong so forget the steady state solution. Comparing a steady state CFX and a steady state Fluent simulation of a model which is transient is totally meaningless.

As Josh says, if the flow is transient you need to run a transient simulation.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2011, 15:04
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Ugly Kid Joe
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 193
Rep Power: 6
vmlxb6 is on a distinguished road
@ Josh and Glen : You guys kick Ass man !!!
vmlxb6 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out saii CFX 2 September 18, 2009 08:07
initialization of flow field to enhance convergence rate to steady state vfico Main CFD Forum 0 September 9, 2009 11:23
initialize flow field with steady state solution holg FLUENT 0 July 13, 2009 17:10
Inviscid Drag at subsonic, subcritical Mach # Axel Rohde Main CFD Forum 1 November 19, 2001 12:19
fluid flow fundas ram Main CFD Forum 5 June 17, 2000 21:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:46.