CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Solving Transport equation for additional variable using CFX

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 3, 2011, 07:44
Default Solving Transport equation for additional variable using CFX
  #1
New Member
 
creddy
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kanpur/UP/India
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 6
creddy_trddc is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,

I want to solve for transport equation for additional variable in CFX (Eqn. is attached with this post). Convective term of the equation has an additional velocity vector added to the fluid velocity, except this equation is in standard transport equation which can be solved using Ansys CFX.

Can Some one tell me how to incorporate this additional term in CFX solver.



Thnx in advance
Attached Images
File Type: jpg AV_Equation.JPG (6.2 KB, 162 views)
creddy_trddc is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 3, 2011, 12:36
Default
  #2
New Member
 
A.R. Baserinia
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 7
baserinia is on a distinguished road
Is the additional velocity divergence-free? If it is, all you need to do is add a source term like this to your transport equation: \rho u_1 \cdot \nabla N^*
baserinia is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2011, 01:45
Default
  #3
New Member
 
creddy
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kanpur/UP/India
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 6
creddy_trddc is on a distinguished road
Hi Amir,

Thnx for your reply...additional velocity is the floatation velocity, it depends on the size of the particle it has only vertical component. So I think this additional velocity is not divergence free....

I have tried to simulate the way you told by taking the additional velocity as divergence and keeping this term as source but I m not getting the results..



Can you please tell me in CFX is it possible to caluculate the gradient of userdefined variable (\nabla\cdot\\\left(u_N^* N^*\right)\)
where N^* is the additional variable...and u_N^* is defined as function of particle size using USER CEL
creddy_trddc is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2011, 07:42
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,646
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
What are you trying to model? Why are the built-in particle or eularian models inadequate?
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2011, 08:09
Default
  #5
New Member
 
creddy
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kanpur/UP/India
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 6
creddy_trddc is on a distinguished road
Dear Glenn,

I want solve the Transient-Transport equation for Number Density Distribution of Spherical Particles in the steady state flow field.

In the equation attached in my starting post...additional convective velocity component added to primary fluid velocity is due to the Floatation caused due to the density distribution between primary fluid and particles. The Source term includes the effects different collision mechanisms (Turbulent, Stokes, Adhesion to walls etc...) between the particles.

Can you plz tell me how to incorporate this Additional COnvective term.

Presently I am creating an Algebraic expression for (u_N^* N^*) and accessing it's divergence in CFX PRE using user subroutine.

Can u plz tell me this approach is correct?
creddy_trddc is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2011, 08:28
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,646
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
There are already built-in with CFX models for floatation, turbulent, viscous/stokes, adhesion to walls etc. Why are these not acceptable?
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2011, 08:32
Default
  #7
New Member
 
creddy
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kanpur/UP/India
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 6
creddy_trddc is on a distinguished road
Dear Glenn,

I am using CFX5 (ANSYS 11)...are this models available in this version...I am unable to find them....Can you please give some reference where I can get the details of these models in CFX.

Thanks a lot for your help.
creddy_trddc is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2011, 09:07
Default
  #8
New Member
 
creddy
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kanpur/UP/India
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 6
creddy_trddc is on a distinguished road
Dear Glenn,

Here I am giving the link for the Journal paper which I am refering for my work,

http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/...0/11/1597/_pdf


on Page no: 1599 the details of transport equations were mentioned.

thanks.
creddy_trddc is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2011, 19:19
Default
  #9
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,646
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
I don't have time to read it in detail, but from a quick look it describes a eularian-eularian model where the equation you describe is implemented. So why don't you also do a eularian-eularian model in CFX and just add the extra models for agglomeration and the other unusual bits. This way you can use the default handling of the phase slip velocities, viscous effects, floatation etc and only need add a few minor extra models.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 16, 2011, 08:35
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 8
Zaktatir is on a distinguished road
how can you get ride of the turbulent diffusion term.. i am trying to define a correct number density additional variable of separated droplets from water film but i am struggling with that term: it leads to very big number of droplets..
Zaktatir is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 16, 2011, 18:57
Default
  #11
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,646
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
I am not an expert in the details of the model. I would contact CFX support for some examples and advice.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 2, 2015, 21:07
Default
  #12
New Member
 
Luke Xu
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
chivalryflamen is on a distinguished road
Hi Creddy,

I know this is a old thread, but did you ever get to solve this problem? I'm having a similar term in my equation and it really bothers me... THanks,

Luke
chivalryflamen is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded nedved OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 13 November 4, 2013 15:13
Extrusion with OpenFoam problem No. Iterations 0 Lord Kelvin OpenFOAM 6 April 12, 2011 11:24
emag beta feature: charge density charlotte CFX 4 March 22, 2011 10:14
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded nedved OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 November 25, 2008 21:21
Could anybody help me see this error and give help liugx212 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 January 4, 2006 19:07


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:13.