CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLOW-3D

Preferred Workstations for Flow3D?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 16, 2008, 06:21
Default Preferred Workstations for Flow3D?
  #1
Jochen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello, i am working in a sanitary company. Our Problem at our simulations with Flow 3D is that we often need very small cell sizes in our cartridges (0,25mm at nested blocks) and high flow velocities (up to 10 - 15m/s in these cells). So the time steps at transient analyses become very small. Using "automatic limited compressibility" and a higher "con" (0,65 - 0,75) helps to get a faster solution but the solution times are still too long. Currently we are in desicion which workstations we should buy for the future work with flow3d.

What are your opinions and experiences? Should we take a workstation with 8 cores (for example 2 Quadcore Intel Xeon with 3,16 GHz, 12 MB L2-Cache & 1333 MHz FSB) or 2 Intel® Xeon Dualcores? Alternatively is it better to use 2 Dual-Core AMD Opteron processors with AMD HyperTransport Technology at the bus system?

Currently we work with a Dual core intel xeon with 3,0 GHZ and a 1333 MHz FSB and the long solution times are not satisfying our requests.

Please help me to built a decision and thanks a lot for your efforts.

Best regards, Jochen
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 17, 2008, 23:32
Default Re: Preferred Workstations for Flow3D?
  #2
michael barkhudarov
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Intel is coming out with a new chip called Nehalem, which has similar NUMA type memory access as AMD currently does. Some of our benchmarks show that Intel processors are generally faster with FLOW-3D, than are AMD chips.

I'd go for 8 cores, although SMP scaling in FLOW-3D does not often go beyond 4 threads at the moment, but plans have been laid out to push it to 8 and 16 cores.

Whatever you decide to get, look for the fastest memory bus, good graphics, large disk space and... good processors!
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 18, 2008, 03:37
Default Re: Preferred Workstations for Flow3D?
  #3
Jochen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Michael, thank you for your quick response,

because the new chip Nehalem is not yet available and at the moment not certified for our other CAE applications we will go to 2 Quadcores from intel.

Greetings, Jochen
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 20, 2008, 00:49
Default Re: Preferred Workstations for Flow3D?
  #4
michael barkhudarov
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sounds good, Jochen. How do you certify new chips? Test it for speed and accuracy? Or just speed?

Michael
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 20, 2008, 14:04
Default Re: Preferred Workstations for Flow3D?
  #5
Satyanarayana Kakollu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Nehalem is available for desktop machines now. The architecture is labeled "Core i7". You will be able to make use of all cores if you get any processor with Core i7. This architecture solves memory bandwidth problem in older "Core 2" processors.

http://www.intel.com/products/deskto...s_body+dt_core

AMD's Shanghai is a good alternative, if you are not able to procure the "Core i7" processor or if it does not fit your IT resource planning. They have a 6-core release planned in this year which you can use to upgrade keeping the old system as is.

Nehalem is certainly faster than Shanghai. Nehalem uses DDR3 memory which is faster than DDR2 memory used by Shanghai. You should budget for the more expensive DDR3 memory as well.

FLOW-3D is a memory Bandwidth limited application, with today's computer architecture.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 24, 2008, 14:20
Default Re: Preferred Workstations for Flow3D?
  #6
Jochen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello Michael, we don't certify the new chips in our company ourselvs. That was a little missunderstood. Because we use 4 other CAE codes beside Flow3D we only buy hardware which is certified from each software package.

Jochen
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why? Preferred droplet track in Two-Phase flows Maurice Kettner CD-adapco 4 January 3, 2012 12:25
Fluent parallel computing on multiple Workstations slower than one peterhess Hardware 1 May 18, 2011 08:08
UNIX Workstations Bumin Ozsoy Main CFD Forum 7 June 6, 2005 03:22
jet preferred mode Xu Zhou Main CFD Forum 0 February 4, 2000 06:13
PC's vs Workstations & computer power Jason Norman Main CFD Forum 11 January 25, 2000 21:21


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52.